Revision as of 21:34, 27 September 2011 editDebresser (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors110,467 edits →On a personal note: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:26, 28 September 2011 edit undoJayjg (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators134,922 edits →Perhaps of interest to youNext edit → | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
An article that you have been involved in editing, '''Falafel''' ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. ] (]) 01:27, 20 September 2011 (UTC) | An article that you have been involved in editing, '''Falafel''' ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. ] (]) 01:27, 20 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
:I don't think I've made any significant edits to that article in years. Anyway, the fact that you dispute the accuracy of one source used for one sentence does not mean the Good Article status will be removed from the article. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 00:26, 28 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Also of interest to you == | == Also of interest to you == |
Revision as of 00:26, 28 September 2011
Thanks for visiting my Talk: page.
If you are considering posting something to me, please: *Post new messages to the bottom of my talk page.
Comments which fail to follow the four rules above may be immediately archived or deleted. Thanks again for visiting. |
This is Jayjg's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43Auto-archiving period: 14 days |
Archives |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
correcting my errors
I thank you once more for your assistance. DGG ( talk ) 04:53, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you, for all the good work you do on Misplaced Pages! Jayjg 05:21, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Research into the user pages of Wikipedians: Invitation to participate
Greetings,
My name is John-Paul and I am a student with the University of Alberta specializing in Communications and Technology.
I would like to include your Misplaced Pages user page in a study I am doing about how people present themselves online. I am interested in whether people see themselves in different ways, online and offline. One of the things I am looking at is how contributors to Misplaced Pages present themselves to each other through their user pages. Would you consider letting me include your user page in my study?
With your consent, I will read and analyze your user page, and ask you five short questions about it that will take about ten to fifteen minutes to answer. I am looking at about twenty user pages belonging to twenty different people. I will be looking at all user pages together, looking for common threads in the way people introduce themselves to other Wikipedians.
I hope that my research will help answer questions about how people collaborate, work together, and share knowledge. If you are open to participating in this study, please reply to this message, on your User Talk page or on mine. I will provide you with a complete description of my research, which you can use to decide if you want to participate.
Thank-you,
John-Paul Mcvea
University of Alberta
jmcvea@ualberta.ca
Johnpaulmcvea (talk) 22:01, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Perhaps of interest to you
An article that you have been involved in editing, Falafel ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Veritycheck (talk) 01:27, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think I've made any significant edits to that article in years. Anyway, the fact that you dispute the accuracy of one source used for one sentence does not mean the Good Article status will be removed from the article. Jayjg 00:26, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Also of interest to you
Heya,
So I just started the article on the new Jewish international news network, Jewish News One. I thought you might like to check it out, see if improvements could be made, maybe add it to your watchlist, eh? :p Thanks.
And now, the Falafel Song. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | 01:59, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks
The idiot user guid123 on Talk:David_Irving needed to be restrained. well done. thank you. bloody holocaust deniers. Cramyourspam (talk) 07:39, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
On a personal note
Ktiva vehatima tova for 5772! A gut gebensht yor! Debresser (talk) 21:34, 27 September 2011 (UTC)