Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Colofac: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:41, 5 October 2011 editColofac (talk | contribs)352 edits Created page with '{{subst:SPI report |checkuser=no <!-- Please do not enter anything in the subject/headline box! If you want to request checkuser, simply change the line above t...'  Revision as of 14:54, 5 October 2011 edit undoTnxman307 (talk | contribs)64,361 edits noteNext edit →
Line 20: Line 20:


======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======
I'm sorry, but we usually don't accept requests to prove innocence in the manner you're suggesting. From ]: "Some wikis allow an editor's IPs to be checked upon his or her request if, for example, there is a need to provide evidence of innocence against a sockpuppet allegation... Such requests are typically declined on the English Misplaced Pages." <font color="darkorange">]</font><b><font color="midnightblue"><big>]</big></font></b><font color="red">]</font> 14:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

---- ----
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> <!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Revision as of 14:54, 5 October 2011

– This SPI case is open.

Colofac

Colofac (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Colofac/Archive.


05 October 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


I have been accused of being a sockpuppet of User:Oakshade on a discussion at Administrators noticeboard/incidents here. These untrue allegations are damaging, and I would like this matter closed through this process. Colofac (talk) 14:41, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

I'm sorry, but we usually don't accept requests to prove innocence in the manner you're suggesting. From WP:CheckUser: "Some wikis allow an editor's IPs to be checked upon his or her request if, for example, there is a need to provide evidence of innocence against a sockpuppet allegation... Such requests are typically declined on the English Misplaced Pages." TNXMan 14:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)


Categories: