Misplaced Pages

Talk:Louise Blouin Media: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:21, 9 December 2008 editTinucherianBot (talk | contribs)134,614 edits WP:MAG Tagging ! ( FAQ ) :(Plugin++) Added {{WikiProject Magazines}}.  Revision as of 07:33, 13 October 2011 edit undoJimbo Wales (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Founder14,538 edits Something to look at: new sectionNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Magazines|class=|importance=}} {{WikiProject Magazines|class=|importance=}}

== Something to look at ==

have responded to the negative story in the New York Observer. I'd like to note as well that the quote we have from the Observer story reads more like an editorial opinion column than an objective news story. The series of lawsuits they describe, if true, don't seem to imply anything about "keeping the lights on" either literally nor metaphorically.

Due to a potential conflict of interest (the Observer article discusses a dinner at which I was in attendance), I won't be getting directly involved. I merely post here to bring the issue to wider attention.--] (]) 07:33, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:33, 13 October 2011

WikiProject iconMagazines Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Something to look at

Louise Blouin Media have responded to the negative story in the New York Observer. I'd like to note as well that the quote we have from the Observer story reads more like an editorial opinion column than an objective news story. The series of lawsuits they describe, if true, don't seem to imply anything about "keeping the lights on" either literally nor metaphorically.

Due to a potential conflict of interest (the Observer article discusses a dinner at which I was in attendance), I won't be getting directly involved. I merely post here to bring the issue to wider attention.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 07:33, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Categories: