Revision as of 15:26, 22 February 2006 editBpuli (talk | contribs)12 edits →IT audit or IS audit?← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:22, 26 March 2006 edit undoGrafikm fr (talk | contribs)11,265 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| width=85% align=center cellspacing=3 style="border: 1px solid #C0C090; background-color: #F8EABA; margin-bottom: 3px;" | {| width=85% align=center cellspacing=3 style="border: 1px solid #C0C090; background-color: #F8EABA; margin-bottom: 3px;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
Is it Information Technology Audit or Information Systems Audit? The latter seems more prominent. -- ] 10:37, 22 February 2006 (UTC) | Is it Information Technology Audit or Information Systems Audit? The latter seems more prominent. -- ] 10:37, 22 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
* Yep, definitely. For the moment I have set up a redirection between those two, but a complete migration from the former to the latter is I think advisable. ] 19:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
== COBIT??== | == COBIT??== |
Revision as of 19:22, 26 March 2006
IT audit or IS audit?
Is it Information Technology Audit or Information Systems Audit? The latter seems more prominent. -- Zondor 10:37, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Yep, definitely. For the moment I have set up a redirection between those two, but a complete migration from the former to the latter is I think advisable. grafikm_fr 19:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
COBIT??
Why is COBIT listed along with a set of laws? COBIT is certainly not a law or a regulation of any kind. See http://www.isaca.org/Template.cfm?Section=COBIT6&Template=/TaggedPage/TaggedPageDisplay.cfm&TPLID=55&ContentID=7981 for more information on COBIT. I think it should be deleted from that section. Bpuli 15:26, 22 February 2006 (UTC)