Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 01:56, 22 October 2011

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Animation/South Park task force page.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days

Animation: South Park Project‑class

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation Project This page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. This page is supported by the South Park task force.

South Park articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total FA 2 6 8 GA 7 3 19 9 1 39 B 4 1 6 4 15 C 5 46 12 2 65 Start 1 3 227 49 6 286 Stub 8 8 List 8 3 9 20 Category 44 44 Disambig 3 3 File 48 48 Project 20 20 Redirect 6 2 245 253 Template 4 4 NA 1 1 Assessed 20 17 319 84 365 9 814 Total 20 17 319 84 365 9 814 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 1,861 Ω = 4.42

WikiProject cleanup listing

I have created together with Smallman12q a toolserver tool that shows a weekly-updated list of cleanup categories for WikiProjects, that can be used as a replacement for WolterBot and this WikiProject is among those that are already included (because it is a member of Category:WolterBot cleanup listing subscriptions). See the tool's wiki page, this project's listing in one big table or by categories and the index of WikiProjects. Svick (talk) 20:19, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Lets Have Episode of The (time frame)

Let's have an episode every two weeks where we all work together to get it up to GA. I figure we could really get this project off the ground if we do that. Anyone else up for that? Or have another suggested time frame?--Iankap99 (talk) 00:45, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

There was an ongoing quality drive for articles that started a few seasons back, it seems to have done a really good job on newer articles. Older articles though haven't yet benefitted from that drive. How's about those with access to stronger Google-fu start on those? WikiuserNI (talk) 17:24, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

More than i quality drive, I'm suggesting a Good Article drive, getting articles up to good article standards. I suggest however, that we start on the best articles that aren't up to GA standards and work our way down. I'm not going to do this on my own, I would need a very committed partner, are you up for it?--Iankap99 (talk) 20:47, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Please see WP:SOUTHPARK/TOPIC. -- Cirt (talk) 00:06, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

• Iankap99, as the above users pointed out, what you are suggesting is largely what we were doing at the SP Topic Drive, which led to some real success with Seasons 1 and 13, but has been fairly inactive lately. I'd love to try to get it started again, so how about we try your GA-drive idea with season 2? We can work on those episodes, and try to get the good topics like the South Park (season 1) FT and the South Park (season 13) GT? — Hunter Kahn 01:34, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Sounds good, but lets have 2 or 3 articles selected from those to be the ones of current emphasis. So that us three can know which ones to cooperate on. Pick them yourself, I have no preference. Sounds like a plan?--Iankap99 (talk) 02:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

There are 3 articles claimed. Collaborating on those might be a good starting point. Nergaal (talk) 06:52, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

• Actually, since those articles are already claimed and have been worked on a bit, I was thinking it would be better to work on some of the unclaimed articles, since they need the most attention. I thought we could start with "Cartman's Mom Is Still a Dirty Slut" and/or "Chickenlover", perhaps? — Hunter Kahn 15:32, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Let's start with articles that need less work to get to GA. On second though, season 2 isn't as developed. How about season 11?--Iankap99 (talk) 04:41, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Inside xBox

Hey SP fans,

I've noticed that in a couple of South Park episode articles Iside Xbox is written as Inside xBox (like over here). Since I don't have the time or energy to fix it myself, I thought I'd drop a line for you guys to do the work. Isn't that nice? ;-) Kind regards, --Soetermans | drop me a line | what I'd do now? 15:29, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Episode notability tags

A while ago, an drive was made to generally improve article content across the seasons. I've not kept an eye on that of late, but some of the earlier, untouched articles are being tagged for notability. Rightly too I suppose, they're reasonably bare bones at the moment. WikiuserNI (talk) 23:17, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Trivia / Cultural References

I'm very sad, that Cultural References sections have to be removed. They are the fun part of episode articles. Does anyone know an alternative, where I can look up which movies are referenced in an episode? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.56.123.225 (talk) 05:22, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Detlef Schrempf reference?

Leaving aside issues of noteworthiness, is this edit correct? I just watched the episode at South Park Studies, and I can't make anything out that looks like "Detlef Schrempf". I can see "Konverse", and something else about "performance tech", but nothing else. Zagalejo^^^ 01:56, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

• Project-Class Animation pages
• NA-importance Animation pages
• Project-Class Animation articles of NA-importance
• Project-Class South Park pages
• NA-importance South Park pages
• South Park task force articles
• WikiProject Animation articles