Talk:2MASS: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 16:05, 20 October 2011 editKheider (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,885 edits {{WPAstronomy\|class=stub\|importance=}} + answer question from 2008. :-)← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:49, 24 October 2011 edit undoAstrocog (talk \| contribs)4,727 edits project importance - within astronomy this is a notable and famous survey, widely used by astronomersNext edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WPAstronomy\|class=stub\|importance=}}		{{WPAstronomy\|class=stub\|importance=mid}}

	==Citations==		==Citations==

Revision as of 19:49, 24 October 2011

Astronomy Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Misplaced Pages.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Citations

I do not understand this article needs more citations: There are 3 links to the original science publications over "2MASS" on the internet, the title article is an own citation of an scientific project, in the article there is a table with citations over the organizations who made the scientific project and the data sources. Is anywhere an article on Misplaced Pages with more citations than that article? Vibria (talk) 16:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

I am late to answer this question, but quite often readers are looking for inline citations to verify what they are reading is from a reliable source. -- Kheider (talk) 16:05, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Categories: