User talk:ISTB351: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 15:27, 4 September 2011 editISTB351 (talk \| contribs)Rollbackers5,078 edits →Scottish elections ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:45, 31 October 2011 edit undo76.243.106.37 (talk) →Snowded and Lam Kin Keung / HeadleyDown Meat/Sockpuppetting: new sectionNext edit →
Line 82:		Line 82:
	Sorry about that. I didn't spot that it was in two sections! Cheers, ] ]] 15:26, 4 September 2011 (UTC)		Sorry about that. I didn't spot that it was in two sections! Cheers, ] ]] 15:26, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
	:No trouble, should have made the original edit summary clearer. ] (]) 15:27, 4 September 2011 (UTC)		:No trouble, should have made the original edit summary clearer. ] (]) 15:27, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

			== Snowded and Lam Kin Keung / HeadleyDown Meat/Sockpuppetting ==


			http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/HeadleyDown

			http://sites.google.com/site/sockmasterouting/ ]


			A detailed run-down of HeadleyDown and his meat/sockpuppets is here:
			https://sites.google.com/site/exposingsocks/ ]


			http://www.nlpconnections.com/forum/15975-master-sock-puppeteer-outed.html ]

			http://www.nlpconnections.com/forum/15975-master-sock-puppeteer-outed-2.html
			]

			Note the comment: by James Donnelly
			::I am a skeptic myself like some other NLPers. However, the NLP article is far from balanced. It looks like a blatant attack on NLP. The website you linked is quite clear on one thing: Pro NLPers have never been banned. That should tell you something: Wikipedians other than youself realize your editing is highly biased. Of course they allow others in to balance the picture.Good luck with promoting your side and routing your foes. I think it will backfire badly though. You and your pseudoskeptic friends will just end up getting banned again. CheersJamesD

			Here's what happened the last time:
			]

			And last but not least, the Misplaced Pages ban on HeadleyDown+sock/meatpuppets and any reincarnation of him, based upon BEHAVIOR.

Revision as of 16:45, 31 October 2011

Hello, ISTB351, and Welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Snowded 20:20, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Misplaced Pages How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Misplaced Pages
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard - a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Misplaced Pages Community Portal Follow Misplaced Pages etiquette Practice civility

not intended to be vandalism

My editors were not intended to be vandalism. I moved all the text to the talk page for discussion and identified the issues there. We can restore it as the issues are resolved. --122.108.140.210 (talk) 02:20, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Scottish elections

Sorry about that. I didn't spot that it was in two sections! Cheers, Number 5 7 15:26, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

No trouble, should have made the original edit summary clearer. ISTB351 (talk) 15:27, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Snowded and Lam Kin Keung / HeadleyDown Meat/Sockpuppetting

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/HeadleyDown

http://sites.google.com/site/sockmasterouting/ ]

A detailed run-down of HeadleyDown and his meat/sockpuppets is here: https://sites.google.com/site/exposingsocks/ ]

http://www.nlpconnections.com/forum/15975-master-sock-puppeteer-outed.html ]

http://www.nlpconnections.com/forum/15975-master-sock-puppeteer-outed-2.html ]

Note the comment: by James Donnelly

I am a skeptic myself like some other NLPers. However, the NLP article is far from balanced. It looks like a blatant attack on NLP. The website you linked is quite clear on one thing: Pro NLPers have never been banned. That should tell you something: Wikipedians other than youself realize your editing is highly biased. Of course they allow others in to balance the picture.Good luck with promoting your side and routing your foes. I think it will backfire badly though. You and your pseudoskeptic friends will just end up getting banned again. CheersJamesD

Here's what happened the last time: ]

And last but not least, the Misplaced Pages ban on HeadleyDown+sock/meatpuppets and any reincarnation of him, based upon BEHAVIOR.