| Revision as of 04:08, 29 March 2006 editJedi6 (talk | contribs)4,620 edits format← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:09, 29 March 2006 edit undoDeckiller (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users33,259 edits →WikiProject: clarificationNext edit → | ||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
| ::::Oh, I'm not saying seperate projects. What I mean is that we'll have major subproject (but more like collaboration) points, such as lists and games. It's mainly for organizational purposes. Also, we don't really have to worry about quantity as much as quality; WPFF has a few core members, which is what we'll have to build first. It's like a buisness; there's various departments devoted to people's strengths (of course, people are involved in multiple departments in many cases). There are many ways we can do this. However, like you and me said before, we should definiately wait at least a month. — ''']]]''' 04:05, 29 March 2006 (UTC) | ::::Oh, I'm not saying seperate projects. What I mean is that we'll have major subproject (but more like collaboration) points, such as lists and games. It's mainly for organizational purposes. Also, we don't really have to worry about quantity as much as quality; WPFF has a few core members, which is what we'll have to build first. It's like a buisness; there's various departments devoted to people's strengths (of course, people are involved in multiple departments in many cases). There are many ways we can do this. However, like you and me said before, we should definiately wait at least a month. — ''']]]''' 04:05, 29 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::::For clarification, this concept of subprojects was brought up as a future plan, when we have a large body of active members and the Todo list grows extremely large. This may never happen (though it's possible). — ''']]]''' 04:09, 29 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Nintendo Revolution== | ==Nintendo Revolution== | ||
Revision as of 04:09, 29 March 2006
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting --~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.
Please post new messages to the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.
 Archives |
|---|
My RfA
My RfA recently closed and it was a success, passing at 84-02-00. I would like to thank you for taking the time to weigh in and on your subsequent support. And I know it's quite cliche, but if you ever need any assistance and/or want another opinion on something, grab a Pepsi and don't hesitate to drop me a line on my talk page. Thanks again. Pepsidrinka 05:12, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the message. I will join. talk
My RfA
|
My RfA | |
| Thank you for supporting/opposing/commenting on my request of adminship, sadly the result was 54/20/7 an thus only 73% support votes, resulting in that the nomination failed. As many of you commenting that I have to few main-space edits, I'll try to better my self on that part. If you have any ideas on what kind of articles I could edit, pleas send me a line. :) | →AzaToth
09:35, 27 March 2006 (UTC) | |
WPSW
I agree; we need to start the marketing plan again either tonight or tomorrow. — Deckiller 23:30, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- Probably, it's coming along well (doing the prose a little by little in microsoft word. — Deckiller 03:29, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- I'm in a position of "power" in a fan club (Star Wars Unlimited Fan Club) and we're working on marketing plans and whatnot. Tomorrow, I might introduce some of the techniques and all, but I'm getting tired :) Any ideas on your end? — Deckiller 03:41, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism
I've blocked over 130 IP addresses, lol...— Deckiller 03:34, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
POV?
Please parlay previous ponderings- Personally, POV pushing present? Pshaw! RE4 previously purloined is paramount, Square pursuing Gamecube purchases? Pfaffly!
Nintendo 128 (disproven)
- Nintendo Page needs to mention more on the early operations of nintendo a perfect job for Jedi6 sorry for nintendo 128 codename mistake i found out that was a name only coined deep within nintendo
Nintendo
You certainly deserved the comments I placed on the Nintendo page. Misplaced Pages is a place that's (by and large) populated by a small number of good editors like you, and a massive influx of vandals and people hell-bent on placing "Wookies forever!" into random articles. Keep up the good work, Jedi6, and if you need any assistance with the Nintendo article again (if Jean Luc keeps up his reverts) let me know. Cheers- Daniel Davis 05:25, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
External Links in @sses
Since when did Wiki say we can't have our own external links...ofcourse we can!
We can add external links, but must explain what the link is...the link must not lead to virus or p0rn sites...if it does it will lead to banning!
WikiProject
Sounds like a good idea. It will have to be really hyped and interesting to all people (I.E. some people will write prose, others will do research, others will copyedit, others will add pics, and so on.) We don't have to assign tasks, but we should really hype things up and go down the checklist. We may wanna wait until I bring the MoS into a wikipedia document (which is WAY behind schedule, I know, but it's getting close). — Deckiller 20:41, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- We have to stay away from articles like Palpatine. We have to pick an article that won't be the source of a lot of fancruft. I'd say we pick something like one of the video games. The video game articles (well, some of them) have too much gaming information, which isn't allowed on the site. — Deckiller 20:48, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- The movies would also work well.
- I've been thinking that, along the lines, we should create a series of "sub-projects" devoted to various tasks. Users strong in video games can be apart of a Star Wars Videogame subproject, which will have its own manual of style. We could also have a list subproject, which works on making sure the lists are concise, complete, logical/organized, and referenced. — Deckiller 20:53, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- Which is exactly why subprojects may be necessary (I mean, look at Final Fantasy; it's a subdivision of WPCVG and it has a few subprojects). Also, I do agree about making sure that we have some active members continuing to edit, hence "along the lines". — Deckiller 20:59, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, I'm not saying seperate projects. What I mean is that we'll have major subproject (but more like collaboration) points, such as lists and games. It's mainly for organizational purposes. Also, we don't really have to worry about quantity as much as quality; WPFF has a few core members, which is what we'll have to build first. It's like a buisness; there's various departments devoted to people's strengths (of course, people are involved in multiple departments in many cases). There are many ways we can do this. However, like you and me said before, we should definiately wait at least a month. — Deckiller 04:05, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
- For clarification, this concept of subprojects was brought up as a future plan, when we have a large body of active members and the Todo list grows extremely large. This may never happen (though it's possible). — Deckiller 04:09, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Nintendo Revolution
All set! — Deckiller 21:16, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- Any registered user can move pages, I believe. — Deckiller 21:19, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, 25 edits to get away with the move. Any logged in user can move a page, though the 25 Edit Rule is often applied (and it should really be applied in this case). If he does it again, I'll give him a warning. — Deckiller 22:30, 28 March 2006 (UTC)