| Revision as of 04:46, 22 November 2011 editDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators407,116 edits a note← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:49, 22 November 2011 edit undoAntandrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators111,295 edits commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| :It is obvious you are not a new user, and do not need warnings for behavior you know is against Misplaced Pages rules. You previously edited under the IP address {{user|190.46.95.25}} and displayed the same behavior. If you wish to edit articles at Misplaced Pages, please choose to interact with people differently. --]''''']''''' 04:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC) | :It is obvious you are not a new user, and do not need warnings for behavior you know is against Misplaced Pages rules. You previously edited under the IP address {{user|190.46.95.25}} and displayed the same behavior. If you wish to edit articles at Misplaced Pages, please choose to interact with people differently. --]''''']''''' 04:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ::IP, I can't disagree with Jayron's decision to block. I will say this: I think you got a rough ride at ], but "fuck you cunt" (to paraphrase some of your commentary) is not a productive avenue and it is likely to get you blocked, in which case no one wins. FWIW, I think your edit to the article was an improvement, but I'm not going to stick my neck out for someone who can't keep their cool. When this is over, or you skip on to the next IP (but wait til the block is over or you'll be in more trouble), I hope you'll prove the very trite but very true cliche that cooler heads prevail. If you do, I'll support any productive edit you make. ] (]) 04:46, 22 November 2011 (UTC) | ::IP, I can't disagree with Jayron's decision to block. I will say this: I think you got a rough ride at ], but "fuck you cunt" (to paraphrase some of your commentary) is not a productive avenue and it is likely to get you blocked, in which case no one wins. FWIW, I think your edit to the article was an improvement, but I'm not going to stick my neck out for someone who can't keep their cool. When this is over, or you skip on to the next IP (but wait til the block is over or you'll be in more trouble), I hope you'll prove the very trite but very true cliche that cooler heads prevail. If you do, I'll support any productive edit you make. ] (]) 04:46, 22 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
| Hi again; I'm sure you remember me. FYI there is a discussion ]. I realize you cannot participate at the moment. 1) I do understand your frustration, and have witnessed now many occasions, for at least the last month, where your perfectly good edits were reverted with "rv vandalism" (or equivalent) summaries. That's not right, and I sympathize. 2) You're going to have a hard time getting help if you don't try to restrain your abusive tone. See Jayron's response to my comment on the ANI thread. To anyone else reading this: do NOT casually revert IP edits if they're done in good faith without giving a reason in the edit summary. I am seeing this happening more and more, and the level of care taken by our vandalism patrollers seems to be dropping. It's a problem that needs wider attention. ] ] 06:49, 22 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:49, 22 November 2011
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
- It is obvious you are not a new user, and do not need warnings for behavior you know is against Misplaced Pages rules. You previously edited under the IP address 190.46.95.25 (talk · contribs) and displayed the same behavior. If you wish to edit articles at Misplaced Pages, please choose to interact with people differently. --Jayron32 04:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- IP, I can't disagree with Jayron's decision to block. I will say this: I think you got a rough ride at Hermann Fegelein, but "fuck you cunt" (to paraphrase some of your commentary) is not a productive avenue and it is likely to get you blocked, in which case no one wins. FWIW, I think your edit to the article was an improvement, but I'm not going to stick my neck out for someone who can't keep their cool. When this is over, or you skip on to the next IP (but wait til the block is over or you'll be in more trouble), I hope you'll prove the very trite but very true cliche that cooler heads prevail. If you do, I'll support any productive edit you make. Drmies (talk) 04:46, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi again; I'm sure you remember me. FYI there is a discussion here. I realize you cannot participate at the moment. 1) I do understand your frustration, and have witnessed now many occasions, for at least the last month, where your perfectly good edits were reverted with "rv vandalism" (or equivalent) summaries. That's not right, and I sympathize. 2) You're going to have a hard time getting help if you don't try to restrain your abusive tone. See Jayron's response to my comment on the ANI thread. To anyone else reading this: do NOT casually revert IP edits if they're done in good faith without giving a reason in the edit summary. I am seeing this happening more and more, and the level of care taken by our vandalism patrollers seems to be dropping. It's a problem that needs wider attention. Antandrus (talk) 06:49, 22 November 2011 (UTC)