Misplaced Pages

Yes, yes, and yes, thank you

Oh you wonderful person... believe it or not I have never figured out how to archive, and have never found the time ... always seems to be something more interesting to do than deal with my own pages. Thank you. I'd love it. If you set it up I think I can figure out faster by seeing what you did than doing myself. (olive (talk) 21:05, 16 November 2011 (UTC))

Thank you so much. i'm very grateful for your help. The page looks great.(olive (talk) 03:42, 18 November 2011 (UTC))

You're quite welcome. :)
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 01:02, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

22's that go thipppppt

I changed it to past tense.  :) Funny because High Standards, the Colt Woodsman/Huntsman, and others were used by SF, Recon, etc in Vietnam and up to the 80's (I'm writing a semiautobiographical piece and one of the bad guys in question uses a Suppressed Woodsman stolen from the armory...and that part is based on a true story), but the SEALs then used Suppressed SW M39's (Hush puppies). Looks like they went back to a bigger bore, probably because they don't need to worry so much about shooting guard dogs these days. Hmm, maybe they'll run a sale on those used Mk2's with the internal can? :) --Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 01:40, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

That's a nice one you've got...my buddy works at AAC, I'll have to see what they offer. I try to get the most out of my cans because I hate the tax...but I've been thinking about a Ruger like that off and on for a while. Maybe I'll break down and sell one of the Uzis to swing it!--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 03:03, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

M14 film

Thanks for the help with the M14 film. The web site you found is much better than Youtube. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.22.156.40 (talk) 20:26, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

You are quite welcome. Archive.org is a preferred site on Misplaced Pages as the projects have similar goals and there is no advertising.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 21:34, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Dreadstar talk

Thanks for completing that revert. I wasn't watching carefully and didn't realize I hadn't reverted all of the trolling comments.(olive (talk) 03:45, 22 November 2011 (UTC))

You're welcome. I've just requested page protection from the trolling and gravedancing.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 03:48, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Blog Link

Hi, I've edited a hyperlink for the words "pecan pie recipe" and "green bean casserole recipe". The link directed to just that - their recipes. I just read that my edits have been rejected and I'm on my last warning for spamming? I thought that I was properly referencing users to resources... this is my first time actually editing wikipedia so I'm confused. The message also said it was blocking it because it doesn't link to blogs or social media websites - well it's not a chat page or anything, it's a Recipe reference with no personal information but it is utilized on a free "blog" website. The stories are the recipes, 100%. It discusses the common ingredients and how to prepare them for the named food and that's all - is that still not allowed?

Anyways, sorry about almost getting banned from wikipedia in the first 15 minutes of "using" it!! :S — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cassyleeripper (talk • contribs) 06:11, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for contacting me. We generally don't allow recipes to be used because we actually prefer reliable sources that are publishing something about the subject matter. You might try looking at google books for more scholarly material (which is what I'm doing at the moment).

I took pause before giving you a level 4 warning...I tried to issue a much milder level 2 but received a notice that this was already done within the last 24 hours and the same thing occurred when I tried a level 3.

If you are wanting to contribute recipes then you may want to take a look at Wikibooks where recipes are welcome...I see one on the front page today. :)
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 06:24, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

I don't see any pecan pies there but here is a pumpkin pie as an example. You could create one for pecan pie. :)
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 06:44, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi again,

Thank you for your suggestion. I guess I just wasn't putting it in the right section after all! :) I'm so new!

Cassandra — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cassyleeripper (talk • contribs) 23:47, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Note

Thank you for fixing the page. My little girl wrote it and I was fixing it same time with you. Thank you for keeping Misplaced Pages sharp! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.124.130.104 (talk) 05:59, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

:)
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 13:58, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 07:53, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

hook me up with some good shit, man!

Could you give me smilies? Don't send me to instructions, just edit my skin or whatever it is and make it happen, please.TCO (talk) 03:35, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Actually, it is just simple instructions and getting the template usage right. It is Template:Smiley.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 03:43, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

(disregard, will use template)TCO (talk) 03:49, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Natalie Wood

Alright, I'll calm down. I'll go away from Misplaced Pages for a while after saying something that's relevant. Weird, isn't it, that there is a consensus that the article should mention Natalie's dates with Raymond Burr and Nick Adams in the 1950s but it should leave out the time she spent with Christopher Walken in North Carolina a month before they had so much trouble on the yacht? Those decisions are weird. People are hinting that a 1950s movie studio arranged dates for closeted gay men, so what's wrong with stating a fact about a man whose closeness to Natalie at the very end of her life led to a lot of trouble?Gertrude Lawrence (talk) 23:08, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. I think you will appreciate that more a little later on. You can take some solace in realizing that the decision wasn't set in stone. Consensus can change.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► 23:20, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

My edit.

What did you find that was not constructive? Please Answer Elsaisdabest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elsaisdabest (talk • contribs) 06:34, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Um... What!?

I came across a minor error while reading the Zodiac Killer page. One of the victims middle and last names had been reversed. I simply corrected that. Yet, somehow, within minutes, you went and 'reverted' this edit, claiming that it appearred 'unconstructive'? What is wrong with you?

No thank-you,

Wolf