Misplaced Pages

User talk:Arcticocean: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:25, 13 December 2011 editBrewcrewer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers55,075 edits →YehudaTelAviv64: re← Previous edit Revision as of 22:06, 13 December 2011 edit undoArcticocean (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users46,248 edits →YehudaTelAviv64: I misspokeNext edit →
Line 34: Line 34:
:*Brewcrewer, which edits do you consider disruptive there? Also, AGK - what would it matter if he has another account that never edited in this topic area? Less slack for policy interpretation issues? <i style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">]]]</i> 18:43, 13 December 2011 (UTC) :*Brewcrewer, which edits do you consider disruptive there? Also, AGK - what would it matter if he has another account that never edited in this topic area? Less slack for policy interpretation issues? <i style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">]]]</i> 18:43, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
::The link I provided was to his contribution history that I guess is always changing. At the time I linked to it, the past bunch of edits since his few day hiatus were to ANI and/or harassment at an AE admin's talk page. The edits sort of spoke for themselves. You can also look at the actual underlying AE report for demonstrated evidence of disruption. How did you come across this issue, btw?--'']] ]'' 20:25, 13 December 2011 (UTC) ::The link I provided was to his contribution history that I guess is always changing. At the time I linked to it, the past bunch of edits since his few day hiatus were to ANI and/or harassment at an AE admin's talk page. The edits sort of spoke for themselves. You can also look at the actual underlying AE report for demonstrated evidence of disruption. How did you come across this issue, btw?--'']] ]'' 20:25, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
* I misspoke earlier: the other account has had plenty to do with I/P. ] </nowiki>]] 22:06, 13 December 2011 (UTC)


== ''The Signpost'': 12 December 2011 == == ''The Signpost'': 12 December 2011 ==

Revision as of 22:06, 13 December 2011

User:AGK/Notice

User talk:Wizard on the rock

Needs access revocation. Calabe1992 00:57, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

{{ygm}}

Received. Will have a think and respond soon. Thanks, AGK 18:08, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Arcticocean. You have new messages at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Padmalakshmisx#Suspected sockpuppets.
Message added 06:27, 10 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Commander (Ping me) 06:27, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

A suspected sockpuppet

Hi, I'm suspecting that User:Ch1902 is a sockpuppet of another user, I reported him here, but apparently I am not allowed to report him directly since I'm under a topic ban. Could you please either check if his IP is the same as another user's IP or report him for me? Thanks-- Someone35  17:54, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

I'd suggest that if you can't open an SPI on a particular editor because you're under a topic ban, then possibly you can't post here about it either. However, I'll note that it was suggested here that you contact AGK about this - perhaps Sean.hoyland meant that you should do so by email.
Regardless of topic ban being relevant or not, a clerk has looked at the SPI you opened, and hinted that it will be declined unless there is more evidence. (I have no opinion on whether AGK should or should not checkuser the editor in question.) If you do want to provide more evidence, email to someone is probably better than further editing the SPI case yourself. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 03:59, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

YehudaTelAviv64

Is his AE still supposed to be pending? He is back editing at full throttle with apparently similar disruptive behavior. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:59, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

The matter is still pending. Regards, AGK 18:21, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
  • Brewcrewer, which edits do you consider disruptive there? Also, AGK - what would it matter if he has another account that never edited in this topic area? Less slack for policy interpretation issues? un☯mi 18:43, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
The link I provided was to his contribution history that I guess is always changing. At the time I linked to it, the past bunch of edits since his few day hiatus were to ANI and/or harassment at an AE admin's talk page. The edits sort of spoke for themselves. You can also look at the actual underlying AE report for demonstrated evidence of disruption. How did you come across this issue, btw?--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:25, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 December 2011