Revision as of 15:26, 6 April 2006 editCommander Keane (talk | contribs)Administrators29,068 edits Take a break from Northrop Grumman?← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:15, 6 April 2006 edit undoHenrik (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,538 edits 3rr warning regarding Northrop GrummanNext edit → | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Hi ViriiK! There has been a heap of conflict over ] recently. I am thinking that it might help if you take a 1 week break from ]. Nothing terrible will happen, and it will let other editors get on with the article. When you come back your refreshed view will enhance the article. What do you think?--] 15:26, 6 April 2006 (UTC) | Hi ViriiK! There has been a heap of conflict over ] recently. I am thinking that it might help if you take a 1 week break from ]. Nothing terrible will happen, and it will let other editors get on with the article. When you come back your refreshed view will enhance the article. What do you think?--] 15:26, 6 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
== 3rr warning regarding ] == | |||
You are in danger of violating the ] on {{{1|a page}}}. Please cease further reverts or you may be ] from further editing. <!-- Template:3RR2 --> ] 16:15, 6 April 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:15, 6 April 2006
Welcome to the Misplaced Pages
I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:
- M:Foundation issues
- Misplaced Pages:Tutorial
- Misplaced Pages:Cleanup resources
- Misplaced Pages:Help desk
- Misplaced Pages:Five pillars
For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.
Assume good faith
You behaviour at Northrop Grumman may be in violation of a core Misplaced Pages principle: Assume good faith. Try to keep in mind that some of our contributors are young and enthusiastic - please encourage rather that discourage. Also remember that an intial edit doesn't need to be brilliantly sourced - sources can develop over time, with encouragement etc. Have a nice day :-) --Commander Keane 13:49, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Take a break from Northrop Grumman?
(before I start, let me say that I have repeated this message for User:Izuko)
Hi ViriiK! There has been a heap of conflict over Northrop Grumman recently. I am thinking that it might help if you take a 1 week break from Northrop Grumman. Nothing terrible will happen, and it will let other editors get on with the article. When you come back your refreshed view will enhance the article. What do you think?--Commander Keane 15:26, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
3rr warning regarding Northrop Grumman
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. Henrik 16:15, 6 April 2006 (UTC)