Misplaced Pages

User talk:ViriiK: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:59, 6 April 2006 editIzuko (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users886 edits →Take a break from Northrop Grumman?← Previous edit Revision as of 18:47, 6 April 2006 edit undoAlphachimp (talk | contribs)29,194 edits Genay ArticleNext edit →
Line 16: Line 16:


You are in danger of violating the ] on ]. Please cease further reverts or you may be ] from further editing. <!-- Template:3RR2 --> ] 16:15, 6 April 2006 (UTC) You are in danger of violating the ] on ]. Please cease further reverts or you may be ] from further editing. <!-- Template:3RR2 --> ] 16:15, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

== Genay Article ==

In the future, instead of reverting articles and issuing personal attacks, please discuss the issue in question on the talk page. Thanks. --] 18:47, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:47, 6 April 2006

Welcome to the Misplaced Pages

I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be bold!

User:Sam Spade

Assume good faith

You behaviour at Northrop Grumman may be in violation of a core Misplaced Pages principle: Assume good faith. Try to keep in mind that some of our contributors are young and enthusiastic - please encourage rather that discourage. Also remember that an intial edit doesn't need to be brilliantly sourced - sources can develop over time, with encouragement etc. Have a nice day :-) --Commander Keane 13:49, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Take a break from Northrop Grumman?

(before I start, let me say that I have repeated this message for User:Izuko)

Hi ViriiK! There has been a heap of conflict over Northrop Grumman recently. I am thinking that it might help if you take a 1 week break from Northrop Grumman. Nothing terrible will happen, and it will let other editors get on with the article. When you come back your refreshed view will enhance the article. What do you think?--Commander Keane 15:26, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

It seems dissenting opinions are no longer wanted on the NGC site. Izuko 17:59, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

3rr warning regarding Northrop Grumman

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Northrop Grumman. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. Henrik 16:15, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Genay Article

In the future, instead of reverting articles and issuing personal attacks, please discuss the issue in question on the talk page. Thanks. --Alphachimp 18:47, 6 April 2006 (UTC)