| Revision as of 10:14, 28 January 2012 editJFHJr (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers15,093 edits →Paul Philippe of Romania: re minor edits← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:20, 28 January 2012 edit undoJFHJr (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers15,093 edits →3RR at Paul-Philippe Hohenzollern: new section | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :] Thank you for ]. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to ], as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with ], a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the ] of clear-cut ] and test edits may be labeled "minor". The relevant discussion is underway at ]. Please feel free to contribute there. <!-- Template:uw-minor --> ] (]) 10:14, 28 January 2012 (UTC) | :] Thank you for ]. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to ], as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with ], a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the ] of clear-cut ] and test edits may be labeled "minor". The relevant discussion is underway at ]. Please feel free to contribute there. <!-- Template:uw-minor --> ] (]) 10:14, 28 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == 3RR at Paul-Philippe Hohenzollern == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are in danger of breaking the ], or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. '''Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a ].''' | |||
| If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. You may still be blocked for ] even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> | |||
| You have as {{user|145.116.225.193}}. If these are not your contribs, please explain. ] (]) 10:20, 28 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:20, 28 January 2012
Paul Philippe of Romania
You may want to look over WP:NOR and WP:IRS. Here are a couple of quotes to ponder: "Misplaced Pages articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources"... "academic and peer-reviewed publications, scholarly monographs, and textbooks are usually the most reliable sources". A picture of a passport hosted on a personal website simply does not fit those criteria. - Biruitorul 15:06, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Paul-Philippe Hohenzollern, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". The relevant discussion is underway at WP:BLPN. Please feel free to contribute there. JFHJr (㊟) 10:14, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
3RR at Paul-Philippe Hohenzollern
Your recent editing history at Paul-Philippe Hohenzollern shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.
You have identified yourself as 145.116.225.193 (talk · contribs). If these are not your contribs, please explain. JFHJr (㊟) 10:20, 28 January 2012 (UTC)