| Revision as of 13:03, 9 February 2012 editBeyond My Ken (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers263,446 edits →Fair warning← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:04, 9 February 2012 edit undoBeyond My Ken (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers263,446 edits →Fair warningNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| You can erase all the comment you want on your talk page but the history is still visible and you are on your third level warning for disruptive editing. You are heading towards a block for being disruptive, edit warring and ] edits. Also, accusing other editors of vandalism when no such thing has taken place violates ]. ]] 11:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC) | You can erase all the comment you want on your talk page but the history is still visible and you are on your third level warning for disruptive editing. You are heading towards a block for being disruptive, edit warring and ] edits. Also, accusing other editors of vandalism when no such thing has taken place violates ]. ]] 11:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :Numerous editors have now told you, via templated warnings, that your edits are disagreed with, and yet you have said nothing in response except |
:Numerous editors have now told you, via templated warnings, that your edits are disagreed with, and yet you have said nothing in response except via edit summary, and you have reverted all their edits without prior discussion. Edit summary remarks are not sufficient. Please respond '''''here''''', on this page, to justify your removal of descriptive lanaguage, in some cases sourced and cited, from lede sentences, and explain why you have reverted their edits. ] (]) 13:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:04, 9 February 2012
February 2012
Constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Brad Bird has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. freshacconci talktalk 11:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- I thought you were retiring... freshacconci talktalk 11:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Misplaced Pages, as you did at Cass Gilbert, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Do not delete sourced information with a discussion and a consensus to do so. Beyond My Ken (talk) 12:37, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Fair warning
You can erase all the comment you want on your talk page but the history is still visible and you are on your third level warning for disruptive editing. You are heading towards a block for being disruptive, edit warring and pointy edits. Also, accusing other editors of vandalism when no such thing has taken place violates WP:CIVIL. freshacconci talktalk 11:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Numerous editors have now told you, via templated warnings, that your edits are disagreed with, and yet you have said nothing in response except via edit summary, and you have reverted all their edits without prior discussion. Edit summary remarks are not sufficient. Please respond here, on this page, to justify your removal of descriptive lanaguage, in some cases sourced and cited, from lede sentences, and explain why you have reverted their edits. Beyond My Ken (talk) 13:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC)