Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:50, 10 February 2012

Welcome!

Hi Nflfacts2k2! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Ian.thomson (talk) 15:09, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012

Your addition to Stanford Routt has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Misplaced Pages without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:32, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:52, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Stanford Routt shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Please use article talk page Nobody Ent 03:36, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm unsure of how to communicate with administrators but here's my 4th try. I was told on the last discussion page to edit with my own words. Someone just keeps going back to delete it and I don't know if they are abusing the page or if there's an actual problem I just EDITED it AGAIN in MY own words that DONT violate copyrights and its been deleted. What gives? Where do I take this? I addeded in my edit link to verify data. I really need help with this- can a senior editor email me please. It's very frustrating to deal with someone basically CLEARING out stuff without reason. Copyright violation you stated and I removed it and added ORIGINAL words and sentences. Please help. And also how do I reach this particular administrator to see what exactly the ISSUE is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nflfacts2k2 (talk • contribs) 02:50, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

To Whom it may concern: I've been blocked by an administrator that claims I am sharing my Wilki account. Such is not the case. Please read the comment I made. I am the only individual that makes changes to the wilkepedia page of Stanford Routt. When I said WE, I was referring to my personal assistant (who also happens to hold a BSc in English and Sports Administration was assisting me NOT posting for me I have never given anyone access to my Misplaced Pages account and have been posting on the SAME account with the same computer for the past 2 years. I don't understand why I would be banned for having a hired assistant help in making sure none of the materials were copywrited- especially since I am the only one making actual only edits. My account has NEVER been shared. I am also not a HE. I am a woman who runs the publicity for the aforementioned Stanford Routt. I think this ban needs to be reexamined because it doesn't appear to be that all sides of the story are being heard. I did not violate any policy of sharing- I never have. And if you guys are to conduct a thorough investigation- you will see that everything that I have said is 100 % truth. Thanks for reading and I'll await your response.

A summary of site guidelines and policies you don't seem to be aware of

• Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, using <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
• "Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
• We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote anything.
• Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Misplaced Pages) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
• Noone owns any article here. It says right below the the "save page" button"If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here." Quit being so defensive about your addition being modifying. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:09, 10 February 2012 (UTC)