| Revision as of 09:34, 1 February 2012 editFsol (talk | contribs)388 edits →Copyright violations← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:04, 18 February 2012 edit undoCodrinb (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,417 edits →Welcome to WP:ROMANIA!: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| :::Apologies, I meant to post it at AN/I but I must have slipped up and posted it at AN. yours with apologies, ] (]) 20:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC) | :::Apologies, I meant to post it at AN/I but I must have slipped up and posted it at AN. yours with apologies, ] (]) 20:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ::::No worry, it's the thought that matters. -- ] (]) 09:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC) | ::::No worry, it's the thought that matters. -- ] (]) 09:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Welcome to ]! == | |||
| Thanks for joining and looking forward to collaborate on great articles! Best regards. --] (]) 18:04, 18 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:04, 18 February 2012
King Michael's abdication
Hi, Fsol. Again, I thank you for pointing out that January 2007 article from the NYT. As I said I would, I did add some of that material in the article on Michael, which I think is the logical place to treat that issue in detail. As a matter of fact, I found a corroboration for the blackmail story -- a 2005 article from the Daily Telegraph. There is though a dispute there, on how to interpret some other sources, maybe you know more about these events and would like to weigh in. Turgidson (talk) 00:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Sure thing -- here is the link you asked for. Turgidson (talk) 19:47, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you, Fsol, for your recent work on Michael I of Romania! It made the article (with a couple of exceptions - see my edits) much better. Lil' mouse (talk) 15:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Copyright violations
Your additions to the lede of Libertarianism are a copyright violation by close paraphrase of Peter Vallentyne's work, specifically:
- Vallentyne, "is the moral view that agents initially fully own themselves and have certain moral powers to acquire property rights in external things"
- Your addition, "is the political philosophy that holds individuals initially own themselves and have property rights in external things"
- In particular, "own themselves and have ... property rights in external things"
Do not do this, it is a copyright violation. Fifelfoo (talk) 07:42, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- These are common terms "own themseleves", "property right", "external thing". It is ridiculous to reformulate just in order to get different terms.Fsol (talk) 08:22, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- You have been mentioned at WP:AN/I. Fifelfoo (talk) 09:08, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- Apologies, I meant to post it at AN/I but I must have slipped up and posted it at AN. yours with apologies, Fifelfoo (talk) 20:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- No worry, it's the thought that matters. -- Fsol (talk) 09:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- Apologies, I meant to post it at AN/I but I must have slipped up and posted it at AN. yours with apologies, Fifelfoo (talk) 20:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- You have been mentioned at WP:AN/I. Fifelfoo (talk) 09:08, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to WP:ROMANIA!
Thanks for joining and looking forward to collaborate on great articles! Best regards. --Codrin.B (talk) 18:04, 18 February 2012 (UTC)