Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Wee Shu Min elitism controversy: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:22, 20 February 2012 editPhantomsteve (talk | contribs)Administrators33,037 edits add delsorts← Previous edit Revision as of 13:18, 20 February 2012 edit undoRyan-D (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,025 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ''''']'''''/]&#124;]\ 11:22, 20 February 2012 (UTC)<!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ''''']'''''/]&#124;]\ 11:22, 20 February 2012 (UTC)<!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ''''']'''''/]&#124;]\ 11:22, 20 February 2012 (UTC)<!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ''''']'''''/]&#124;]\ 11:22, 20 February 2012 (UTC)<!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small>
*'''Keep''' - I think the incident is best taken in the backdrop of the increasing concerns in Singapore about elitism and social class divide in the last 5 years or so. While the issue is still a hot-button topic, I think the information in this article is important. It might not deserve its own article, but until there is a suitable one to merge it into, I believe it should be kept. -]] 13:18, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:18, 20 February 2012

Wee Shu Min elitism controversy

Wee Shu Min elitism controversy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a single event which generated coverage at the time, but not long-standing coverage. I do not think it meets the criteria for inclusion on the English Misplaced Pages PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 11:13, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 11:22, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 11:22, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep - I think the incident is best taken in the backdrop of the increasing concerns in Singapore about elitism and social class divide in the last 5 years or so. While the issue is still a hot-button topic, I think the information in this article is important. It might not deserve its own article, but until there is a suitable one to merge it into, I believe it should be kept. -ryand 13:18, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Categories: