| Revision as of 19:05, 13 February 2012 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) from User talk:SaveATreeEatAVegan. | Revision as of 05:19, 24 February 2012 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) from User talk:SaveATreeEatAVegan.Next edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| Thank you, -- ] (]) 05:02, 9 February 2012 (UTC) | Thank you, -- ] (]) 05:02, 9 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Republican 2012 Maps == | |||
| Can you adjust the color tones on the maps to be color-blind compliant? A user has requested this. Message ]ed on other map editor talk pages.--] (]) 10:02, 12 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I appreciate you giving me the heads up on my page. I've adjusted the republican map now for an individual with a red-blue color vision problem. The issue with color-blind compliance, is an individual's deficiency can vary from one person to another. For instance, is a map on the commons for someone who has a red-green color vision problem. We also have an excellent article here on Misplaced Pages under ] that even breaks down Color vision deficiencies . Check it out if you have a moment, then you'll have a better understanding of where I'm coming from. ]] 02:00, 13 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Maybe there should be multiple maps? One map would show "by default" for those with normal vision, and users with color vision issues could click a link to one or more alternate versions of the map. The red-yellow-blue map currently being used has some issues, namely that yellow refers to Gingrich on that map, but on most other 2012-primary-cycle maps on Misplaced Pages gold means Ron Paul, possibly leading to confusion. It'd be better to just decide on one "standard" default set of colors and then give individuals with colorblindness one or more alternatives to choose from. ] (]) 04:29, 13 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::I like your idea of multiple maps. I'll have to look into it further and figure out the best way to utilize that idea. I could possibly add 'mini-links' right underneath the map, that way user's would be able to 'click' on a multiple 'range' of color schematics. Hopefully this would ensure that a broader range of users would be able to view whatever map best fits their color vision deficiency. ]] 04:43, 13 February 2012 (UTC)<span style= "color:rgb(238,18,4)"><br></br> | |||
| *New map context faceplate. This would all be centered. | |||
| <br></br>'''Red'''</span> denotes a state won by ]. <br/><span style= "color:rgb(255,232,3)">'''Yellow'''</span> denotes a state won by ]. <br/><span style="color:rgb(3,26,255)">'''Blue'''</span> denotes a state won by ].<br/><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102)">Grey</span> denotes a state that has not yet voted.<br>Note that not all states are "winner-take-all."<br /><br>*Delegate counts are displayed as projected / committed. For projected counts from different news sources see ].<br />**Missouri held a non-binding primary on February 7, which Santorum won, but its delegates will be allocated based on caucuses in March<br></br><br><small>‡ Protanopia friendly map</br><br>‡ Deuteranopia friendly map</br><br>‡ Tritanopia friendly map</br></small><br> ‡ For individual's with color vision deficiency</br> | |||
| <br> | |||
| I could attach each sub-context deficiency with a link to a different map. The color schematics would come from colblindor.com: | |||
| *, | |||
| *, | |||
| * | |||
| ]] 06:08, 13 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| The user who asked is red-green colorblind, which is the most common iirc. I think if you simply adjust the shades to be different (check it with grayscale), then its good to go for everyone, color blind or not, and all types of colorblind. Its a common oversight tho. If you arent color blind, why would you even think of it! I actually am slightly color blind myself. I have trouble with some Ishihara tests, but it has no effect on my function other than that. You could also check with the other mapmakers what to do, but Im pretty sure that just modding the shades will work fine.--] (]) 06:41, 13 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| {{tb|User:Metallurgist}} | |||
| == File:800px-Republican Party presidential primaries results, 2012 (maine).png listed for deletion == | |||
| A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 03:44, 13 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:19, 24 February 2012
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:SaveATreeEatAVegan. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
I am a beginner and Want to know how to write an article.
Dear SaveATreeEatAVegan, I am really thankful for your help. As you know I am a very beginner in Misplaced Pages therefore, I would like you to help me contributing on some of the notable subjects of Pakistan and specifically Sindh Province. In this regard I would try to contribute to some historical places, biographies of living/dead persons, Institutions/organizations, Culture, Biodiversity and etc. I really want to know How to start/write a new article. I feel there are lots of subjects of Pakistan and Sindh Province that have not been contributed yet to Misplaced Pages because of lack of participation from that area. Thank You Postosoft (talk) 09:38, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- No problem, Postosoft! I'd be delighted to assist you in starting new articles, and I look forward to seeing those much needed subjects from Pakistan and the Sindh Province. You're right, we definitively need more contributions from that part of the world to help us grow. Why don't you start by reading this article which explains the basics on creating your first article. Also, I'd like to suggest that you make some edits to already created articles, which will help you get a feel of how Misplaced Pages works. As far as any questions you might have, please feel free to ask me anytime, that's what I'm here for! If you'd like, you may even give me a subject on which you wish to start an article for, and I can walk you through it one step at a time! Let me know, friend! Glad to help! SaveATreeEatAVegan 02:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Non-free files in your user space
Hey there SaveATreeEatAVegan, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:SaveATreeEatAVegan.
- See a log of files removed today here.
- Shut off the bot here.
- Report errors here.
- If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Republican 2012 Maps
Can you adjust the color tones on the maps to be color-blind compliant? A user has requested this. Message cced on other map editor talk pages.--Metallurgist (talk) 10:02, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- I appreciate you giving me the heads up on my page. I've adjusted the republican map now for an individual with a red-blue color vision problem. The issue with color-blind compliance, is an individual's deficiency can vary from one person to another. For instance, here is a map on the commons for someone who has a red-green color vision problem. We also have an excellent article here on Misplaced Pages under Color blindness that even breaks down Color vision deficiencies by cause. Check it out if you have a moment, then you'll have a better understanding of where I'm coming from. SaveATreeEatAVegan 02:00, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Maybe there should be multiple maps? One map would show "by default" for those with normal vision, and users with color vision issues could click a link to one or more alternate versions of the map. The red-yellow-blue map currently being used has some issues, namely that yellow refers to Gingrich on that map, but on most other 2012-primary-cycle maps on Misplaced Pages gold means Ron Paul, possibly leading to confusion. It'd be better to just decide on one "standard" default set of colors and then give individuals with colorblindness one or more alternatives to choose from. 173.165.239.237 (talk) 04:29, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- I like your idea of multiple maps. I'll have to look into it further and figure out the best way to utilize that idea. I could possibly add 'mini-links' right underneath the map, that way user's would be able to 'click' on a multiple 'range' of color schematics. Hopefully this would ensure that a broader range of users would be able to view whatever map best fits their color vision deficiency. SaveATreeEatAVegan 04:43, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- I like your idea of multiple maps. I'll have to look into it further and figure out the best way to utilize that idea. I could possibly add 'mini-links' right underneath the map, that way user's would be able to 'click' on a multiple 'range' of color schematics. Hopefully this would ensure that a broader range of users would be able to view whatever map best fits their color vision deficiency. SaveATreeEatAVegan 04:43, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Maybe there should be multiple maps? One map would show "by default" for those with normal vision, and users with color vision issues could click a link to one or more alternate versions of the map. The red-yellow-blue map currently being used has some issues, namely that yellow refers to Gingrich on that map, but on most other 2012-primary-cycle maps on Misplaced Pages gold means Ron Paul, possibly leading to confusion. It'd be better to just decide on one "standard" default set of colors and then give individuals with colorblindness one or more alternatives to choose from. 173.165.239.237 (talk) 04:29, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- New map context faceplate. This would all be centered.
Red denotes a state won by Mitt Romney.
Yellow denotes a state won by Newt Gingrich.
Blue denotes a state won by Rick Santorum.
Grey denotes a state that has not yet voted.
Note that not all states are "winner-take-all."
*Delegate counts are displayed as projected / committed. For projected counts from different news sources see Results of the 2012 Republican Party presidential primaries.
**Missouri held a non-binding primary on February 7, which Santorum won, but its delegates will be allocated based on caucuses in March
‡ Protanopia friendly map
‡ Deuteranopia friendly map
‡ Tritanopia friendly map
‡ For individual's with color vision deficiency
I could attach each sub-context deficiency with a link to a different map. The color schematics would come from colblindor.com:
SaveATreeEatAVegan 06:08, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
The user who asked is red-green colorblind, which is the most common iirc. I think if you simply adjust the shades to be different (check it with grayscale), then its good to go for everyone, color blind or not, and all types of colorblind. Its a common oversight tho. If you arent color blind, why would you even think of it! I actually am slightly color blind myself. I have trouble with some Ishihara tests, but it has no effect on my function other than that. You could also check with the other mapmakers what to do, but Im pretty sure that just modding the shades will work fine.--Metallurgist (talk) 06:41, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
File:800px-Republican Party presidential primaries results, 2012 (maine).png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:800px-Republican Party presidential primaries results, 2012 (maine).png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:44, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}