| Revision as of 15:07, 10 August 2011 editTnxman307 (talk | contribs)64,361 edits archive← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:49, 25 March 2012 edit undoWikiEditor2004 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users51,646 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> | <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> | ||
| {{SPIarchive notice|DIREKTOR}}<br />{{SPIpriorcases}} | {{SPIarchive notice|DIREKTOR}}<br />{{SPIpriorcases}} | ||
| {{SPI case status|CUrequest}} | |||
| =====<big>25 March 2012</big>===== | |||
| ;Suspected sockpuppets | |||
| * {{checkuser|1=]}} | |||
| <!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> | |||
| * <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> | |||
| I want to ask you for help. I noticed of ] and after I reverted an obviously inaccurate edit (there is no evidence that term "Nedić regime" was used as a name for territory) I checked edits of ] and I concluded that edits and views of this user are extremely similar to those of ]. Furthermore, my view is shared by other two users, please see and . Furthermore, it was ] who created userpage of ] (see evidence - the first edit on that list: . I think that you should check is ] a sockpuppet of ] - there is notable amount of similar topics of interest and views shared by these two accounts and there is also an POV revert warring involved with multiple users (please see diffs: , , .. Furthermore, ] claims to live in Australia, so if checkuser shows that he lives in Croatia, we will have an evidence of disruption. Also note that ] has a history of disruptive behaviour and topic ban from all Balkans articles and talkpages was imposed on him by an admin (see evidence here on the bottom of the page: ). Ban was later lifted because of procedural mistake of the admin, but evidence about history of disruptive behavior in the past is clearly here. ] 21:49, 25 March 2012 (UTC) ] 21:49, 25 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | |||
| <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | |||
| ---- | |||
| <!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | |||
Revision as of 21:49, 25 March 2012
DIREKTOR
DIREKTOR (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/DIREKTOR/Archive.
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
25 March 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- (] · · ] · ] · logs · filter log · ] · spi block · block log · ] · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
I want to ask you for help. I noticed this edit of User:Peacemaker67 and after I reverted an obviously inaccurate edit (there is no evidence that term "Nedić regime" was used as a name for territory) I checked edits of User:Peacemaker67 and I concluded that edits and views of this user are extremely similar to those of User:DIREKTOR. Furthermore, my view is shared by other two users, please see this and this. Furthermore, it was User:DIREKTOR who created userpage of User:Peacemaker67 (see evidence - the first edit on that list: . I think that you should check is User:Peacemaker67 a sockpuppet of User:DIREKTOR - there is notable amount of similar topics of interest and views shared by these two accounts and there is also an POV revert warring involved with multiple users (please see diffs: , , .Here User:DIREKTOR reverted article to last version by User:Peacemaker67. Furthermore, User:Peacemaker67 claims to live in Australia, so if checkuser shows that he lives in Croatia, we will have an evidence of disruption. Also note that User:DIREKTOR has a history of disruptive behaviour and topic ban from all Balkans articles and talkpages was imposed on him by an admin (see evidence here on the bottom of the page: ). Ban was later lifted because of procedural mistake of the admin, but evidence about history of disruptive behavior in the past is clearly here. PANONIAN 21:49, 25 March 2012 (UTC) PANONIAN 21:49, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: