Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:11, 27 March 2012

Archives at

1. User talk:Kww/04022009
2. User talk:Kww/Archive05202009
3. User talk:Kww/Archive09072009
4. User talk:Kww/04012010
5. User talk:Kww/04232010
6. User talk:Kww/06052010
7. User talk:Kww/06182010
8. User talk:Kww/07182010
9. User talk:Kww/07242010
10. User talk:Kww/11012010
11. User talk:Kww/04142011
12. User talk:Kww/08252011
13. User talk:Kww/03122012

Jay Sean page, what's wrong?

Thanks for your quick reply, is there a email adress or phone number so that the management can contact wikipedia directly? Would you accept an accepted faq checked bio from the artist himself? Surely you must understand that often times bio's get pulled from strange places before an artists career affords him the luxury of getting a professional and factual one done. especially ones that come from a particular scene, such as Jay does that is rampant with false reports and strange headlines.

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Funsjacobs (talk • contribs) 07:46, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Dear Sir/Madam, I edited the Jay Sean page because of a request of his direct management. You undid all the changes in the lead and I was wondering why so I can correct it again and do it right this time. Please let me know, thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Funsjacobs (talk • contribs) 20:59, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Help Pt. II

Hey,Thanks for your speedy response. Im requesting semi-protection because there has been alot of information being added that isn't exactly factual. There are being going on and claim to be a current or former member of the group. False or missing details about past projects and partnerships. Not to mention, these are a group of kids that sings songs by some of today's best artist. Their YouTube page and videos gets bombarded with vandalism constantly and it would just help to nip it in the root before it can possible get to that point.--IamMusic111 (talk) 17:54, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Help with Semi-Protection

Hey, I need some help with semi-protecting a page. I've been trying to read up on it as much as possible, but this Wiki lingo really confuses me. Any tips or advice you can give me on starting the process? Thanks! --IamMusic111 (talk) 14:18, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

One Direction album vandalism again

your an amazing editor thanks for the guidance today i understand know. but the unregistered user has once again vandalized the page removing charts that were properly sourced. please semi protect i'm tired of the edit war AdabowtheSecond (talk) 23:19, 11 March 2012 (UTC)AdabowtheSecond

what's wrong with one direction book cover

first it was wrong because there were two books but now there's only what's the problem? adabowthesecond — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdabowtheSecond (talk • contribs) 13:54, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Croatia

How reliable is the Croatian charts being added like here? — Legolas 06:45, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Muhammad images closed

An arbitration case regarding Muhammad images has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

1. The community is asked to hold a discussion that will establish a definitive consensus on what images will be included in the article Muhammad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), and on where the images will be placed within the article. As with all decisions about content, the policies on verifiability and the neutral point of view must be the most important considerations. The editors who choose to participate in this discussion are asked to form an opinion with an open mind, and to explain their decision clearly. Any editor who disrupts this discussion may be banned from the affected pages by any uninvolved administrator, under the discretionary sanctions authorised in this decision. The decision reached in this discussion will be appended to this case within two months from the close of the case.
2. Ludwigs2 is prohibited from contributing to any discussion concerning Muhammad.
3. Ludwigs2 is banned from the English Misplaced Pages for one year.
4. Tarc is admonished to behave with appropriate professionalism in his contributions to discussions about disputed article content.
5. FormerIP is admonished to behave with appropriate professionalism in his contributions to discussions about disputed article content.
6. Hans Adler is reminded to engage in discussions about disputed article content with an appropriate degree of civility.
7. Standard discretionary sanctions are authorised for all pages relating to Muhammad, broadly interpreted.
8. The participants in the dispute about depictions of Muhammad are reminded that editors who engage extensively in an intractable dispute can become frustrated, and that it is important to be aware that as editors we are limited in our ability to contribute constructively to a deadlocked disagreement. Our exasperation with a dispute can make us unprofessional or unreceptive to compromise. We therefore encourage the disputants of this case to consider if their participation in the coming community discussion of depictions of Muhammad would be useful, and we remind them that if they disrupt the community discussion they may be banned from the discussion or otherwise sanctioned under the discretionary sanctions provision of this case.

Mlpearc (powwow) 16:18, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

For the Arbitration Committee

Charles again

is editing with 86.173.58.96 (talk · contribs). Thank you in advice. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:33, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Is once again vandalizing as the same IP. Thanks! —WP:PENGUIN · 19:21, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

3D Printing - Resolution

I will leave you the same comment I left for Sjö:

I noticed you reverted the resolution section of 3D printing. Unfortunately, this has introduced an error into the text. The layer thickness of a 3D printer is typically from 50 μm to 100 μm. This is the same as 0.05 mm to 0.1 mm (or 0,05 mm to 0,1 mm using a comma decimal separator). I believe the author of the resolution section was trying to use both methods of expression because many people considerable less familiar with micrometers than they are with millimeters. Therefore, s/he used both forms in the section.

I hope this explains why the units have been altered yet again.

Best wishes, CaviaPorcellus (not logged in because I am not at my own computer) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.117.13.130 (talk) 13:15, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hello kww could you semi protect cher lloyd home page, single pages, albums pages everyday they're multiple vandalism i don't know how?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdabowtheSecond (talk • contribs) 18:49, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

response

wanted an account with a different name i always think people think my edits are not worthy cause of my obvious age that's stated in my name. couldn't think of an account name so i just named myself after an editor but then theSecond after it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdabowtheSecond (talk • contribs) 03:38, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

 How did you know my former edit name some kind IP address attached?? don't understand alot of wikipedia yet  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdabowtheSecond (talk • contribs) 03:43, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for being a LOYAL Wikipedian!

Thanks for all your hard work and working on the page: Starships (song)! I appreciate it and keep up the good work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zach464 (talk • contribs) 19:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

User talk:Bstark247

Hey Kww--regardless of the copyright status of the links added by this user, they dont meet the WP:EL requirements, do they? Someone's cleaning them up, and I have to agree. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Rihannano1fan

Hi,
FYI: User talk:Rihannano1fan#Enough is enough.
Cheers, Amalthea 16:03, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

one direction semi protection

please semi protect they're home page . the semi protection expired and i have already reverted 8 vandalism please?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdabowtheSecond (talk • contribs) 18:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

PhoenixJHudson (talk · contribs)

Is there any chance that this is an innocent user caught up in Iluvrihanna24 (talk · contribs)'s sockpuppet clean-up? I am not familiar with that situation and am seeking more experienced opinion. I've declined an initial unblock request as the user seems to be purposefully obfuscating their situation. This could be due to inexperience and I'd like to be as sure as possible that the user gets a fair shake. Thanks Tiderolls 01:02, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Follow up. It appears to be another attempt at block evasion. I would still appreciate your opinion on the matter, however. Tiderolls 01:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

RainbowDash / Futtershy and an unsuccessful ArbCom candidate

, – Out of curiosity, are you the unsuccessful ArbCom candidate mentioned in these diff's? --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 16:30, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm not aware that I've had any interaction with Fluttershy. What makes you think of me?—Kww(talk) 18:00, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

I didn't think of you. If I remember correctly, you believe that "ban means ban", so I don't believe that you had a relationship with Futtershy. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 19:04, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Charlie's back

as 86.182.147.206 (talk · contribs) Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:23, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

and rapidly changed to 86.135.191.216 (talk · contribs) Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:35, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

• Another block request: 86.161.33.18 (talk · contribs) Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:09, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
  • And another 86.173.48.147 (talk · contribs). Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 18:06, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
    • And other 86.182.147.124 (talk · contribs) Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 17:17, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Charlie still static as 86.182.111.70 (talk · contribs) Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:23, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Am I annoying you with this requests? I found another 86.174.146.216 (talk · contribs). Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 23:02, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Another at 86.173.50.86 (talk · contribs) Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Returned as 81.159.129.117 (talk · contribs) Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 22:16, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Now as 86.173.48.245 (talk · contribs) Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 18:38, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Help

This guys trying to get me blocked. and hes hounding me on my talk page. Cause he don't want to listen. Jivesh suggested I report them for harrassment but I don't know how to so she suggested I ask you. Could you please help? Swifty*_contribs 15:36, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Blue (LeAnne Rimes song)/

Oh dear, somebody has now moved it back to single. Can you sort? Perhaps it needs some protection? BTW Thanks for your help in sorting out all the copy and paste etc. I was just about to put a requested move back to Bill Mack song, but can't now. --Richhoncho (talk) 17:14, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Re:

I'm not falsely accusing anything the dude wouldn't look at the facts as no one will. There was an edit war on that page that fastily warned an editer over and no one no one will look and notice that the references in question were used on the Blue (Bill Mack song) that was resolved the day before the page was made. That right there is proof that I'm not in the wrong! Why won't NO ONE SEE THIS?!?!?!?! Swifty*_contribs 18:29, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

It is all right here but here is the warning and Fastily's stand in it as well as my reply. Swifty*_contribs 19:24, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

But no one wants to listen to me. I use to be under User:JamesAlan1986 till it got blocked for being compromised and even User:Status could tell you I am a very good contributor along with a lot of others. I look thoroughly through sources and everything but I'm done I'm done trying to help on here I'm done with people starting stuff with me every time I turn around cause no one wants to either compromise or want to put everything on me when I sit there and try to point out things over and over and over again but there are very few people on here who will actually listen, like Status, Fastily, etc, they'll listen. Everyone else is too stubborn and do just what they want to prove their right and will go to extremes to get their way when someone points out they are not and proof is shown and staring them right in the face. But I really don't care anymore I'm done. Swifty*_contribs 19:33, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Here is where it shows you it's about the sources. Swifty*_contribs

Ok looks like no one will listen to me. Dfw.com was not reliable as it used a fan uploaded video from YouTube.com. The original page made statement that Mack had recorded the song but whether he released it as a single is still questionable. I've never found a source to state that he did and until there is one it should've stayed as it was but it was done wrong and without compromise, etc. so techinically the creation of Blue (Bill Mack song) was wrong and should not have happened but why does anyone care? Swifty*_contribs 17:19, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Most reliable sources use official sites like CMT.com not some random video they found on YouTube. I know the video exist on CMT.com as I was the one who posted it as an external link. I don't question prior recordings what I question is why post it as the writer where I see no reliable source stating Mack himself released the song as a single. globaldogproductions.info does not count to me as it's not Billboard.com the most used source to show such information in fact I went on Billboard.com and Rimes is the only person credited to the song. No one else but should it be made notable that others have recorded it yes but should it be under Macks name probably not as I stated matter. And I'll go as far to show you Billboard.coms search results on Bill Mack. Swifty*_contribs 17:43, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

The problem is there is too many conflicting sources I can prove that Rimes is the only one credited as putting it out as a single which most wikipedia pages of songs are. It should've stayed as Rimes' song as she released it as a single and made mention of previous recordings but to state that Mack released it as a single when so many of the sources on the page can be contradicted by the most reliable source of all Billboard.com then we got a conflict of interest here. The fact is I knew Mack recorded it I never denied that. But hes recording was a demo to give out to artist so they could decide if they can record it. Linda Davis recorded Does He Love You before Reba McEntire did, Reba stated she was listening to Davis on the demo in her book Reba: My Story so should "Does He Love You" it be stated that Davis released a demo of the song. Most pages don't but just cause Mack demoed it doesn't mean he should get a song page to himself no it means he should get a mention that he recorded it. Swifty*_contribs 17:54, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Here's to show Reba: My Story exist. I'll have to get what pages from my significant other later. And here's something else, using my significant other as a prime example. He'd not consider "Does He Love You", Linda Davis' song just because Davis recorded it prior to McEntire. He'd consider it more McEntire song as she recorded it, and released it as a single where Davis did not. And "Blue" should be treated no differently. Swifty*_contribs 18:03, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

I got to go. I don't have internet at home and my significant other doesn't want to be stuck here at the library while I try to make my point. I hope you're taking what I'm saying into strong consideration. I'm sure I'm not the only person who feels strongly on this, though I'm probably the only one who's willing to fight it. Swifty*_contribs 18:06, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

This is how it should've been done. Swifty*_contribs 18:52, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

My significant other has this to say on it: "Demos don't count. Just cause someone did a demo doesn't mean they get credit for the song, if you look you can find that Reba McEntire and Dolly Parton also did demos but they don't get credited for it. So why should Mack?" Swifty*_contribs 18:58, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

You know it's funny but I've had WP:COMMON thrown at me and so many other stuff that support that it should be on the Blue (LeAnn Rimes song) that it's funny they don't apply now. Swifty*_contribs

Yep. Also um, please don't revert my talk page. If you can pleasen move it to the Archives instead of reverts if you misposted. Thanks! Swifty*_contribs 20:23, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom RfC

Trying to get some path set here for how to proceed on the ArbCom RfC.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 06:28, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Scrooge McDuck in the United States

Regarding your edit to Scrooge McDuck, The Life and Times of Scrooge McDuck by Don Rosa explicitly shows him emigrating to the United States from Scotland. JIP | Talk 04:36, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Scrooge McDuck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scottish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Semi protect request

Moved to down here at the bottom by me to keep within proper formatting. JIP | Talk 20:09, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello kww could you semi protect cher lloyd home page, single pages, albums pages everyday they're multiple vandalism i don't know how?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdabowtheSecond (talk • contribs) 18:46, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Blue Part 2

You know instead of questioning me why not question Moriori who seems to be doing this to more then one page. Swifty*_contribs 15:13, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Look what they said to me. Swifty*_contribs 15:27, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

This is what happens when you let vandals do what they want. They lass out at those of use who have been on here longer and I've been on here quite a while though i lost my User:JamesAlan1986 account cause it was compromised. I don't appreciate how people will sit here and pick and chose when it comes to the rules of Misplaced Pages. I'm sick of this and it has always been a problem on here. Things need to be restored on here and I don't appreciate what Moriori said to me. It was weak and a low blow cause they didn't like the contradictions shown to them plus they are doing it to more then one page instead of going by the WP standards. That's not their place or their right. They did not follow the rules before creating that page and I'm SICK of everyone picking and choosing I'm done and I will not return to Misplaced Pages because of this. And there will be a lot of people pissed to see me go. Swifty*_contribs 15:32, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Tell me where Mack says in there I released this as a single on my own. All I see is he wanted the song to be known and was doing everything he could to make it happen but no where does it say "I released it as a single" and that's the point. He didn't want credit for it he wanted the song known. Swifty*_contribs 16:10, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

This can be controdicted by Amazon.com & Billboard.com as Mack has 29 songs and neither page mentions "Blue" as his song. Swifty*_contribs 16:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

It comes down to this. Rimes is most notable for the song which is how it has been on Misplaced Pages for years. As you can see here the page was created in 2007 where as the Blue (Bill Mack song) was created recently so let me ask this. Which should've stayed? The oldest or the newest. And isn't WP:COMMON state that we use most commonly known? Mack is not most commonly known for Blue where Rimes is. How many times do I have to say that? Swifty*_contribs 16:23, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Should we mention Mack recorded it? Yes but not with sources that can be contradicted. The page already made mention long before that Mack recorded it so why did it Blue have to be merged to a page most recently created? Because someone falsely believed he put it out as a single? Cause that was the big problem to begin with. Swifty*_contribs

See look here at Safe & Sound. Safe & Sound (song) is the only one in existence but there are other songs by that by different artist. Should Safe & Sound (song) be moved right now to Safe & Sound (Taylor Swift song)? No cause no other pages of the song exist right? So let's see here Blue (LeAnn Rimes song) was created in 2007 but Blue (Bill Mack song) was created recently. Hmmm I think Blue (Bill Mack song) should've been the one redirected. Swifty*_contribs 16:33, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Let me ask you this. Since Mack never released the song as a single would you post the infobox on Blue (LeAnn Rimes song)? Or would you have put the source stating he recorded it next to prior sources that stated he recorded it? Swifty*_contribs 16:41, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Now do you see where the edit war began on Blue (LeAnn Rimes song) and why I've been so against the creation of Blue (Bill Mack song) the page was being vandilized and because I contradicted Blue (Bill Mack song) was created. Swifty*_contribs 16:43, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

I want to point this out too. Isn't Blue (Bill Mack song) falsely stating he released it as a single? Swifty*_contribs 16:52, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

I pretty much am making a lot of good points but if you still want to agree with the ones who created the page and are wrong for doing so then what I stated on my talk page is how I feel and I am done. Swifty*_contribs 16:55, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

And as far as Moriori is concerned they need to back off me cause they, pardon my French, do not need to tell me what the h*ll to do.

Seems to me it would be rewarding for you to honour your "Retired" banner, to go away for a bit to recharge, and then come back refreshed sometime in the future.

They have no business saying that to me NONE! Swifty*_contribs 17:21, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

I don't have internet at home anymore. That's why my page states I'm retired but because of this bs I've been going to the library everyday to deal with this but I don't try to stick on here too long cause if you've noticed this has been going on for quite some time now because I have to get off here and go home. Swifty*_contribs 17:26, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm an idiot

Just curious: after all this time, how can you still wind up having discussions with Brexx instead of just letting me know he's back?—Kww(talk) 22:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Bahahah, it honestly never even crossed my mind that this could be a sock of Brexx -facepalm-. Thanks for the block :) - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 22:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Re: WP:BADCHARTS

I didn't knew that! :O Thank you, I won't. :) - Saulo 14:09, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Aaron • 21:20, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

PhoenixJHudson (talk · contribs)

Hi, Kww. I'm reluctant to interfere with a mentorship so I'm bringing my concern here first. In your advice you mention a large section being inserted into the article with this edit. I believe the situation to be much more concerning as that edit essentially reinstated PhoenixJHudson's version of the article as editied on their talk page during their block. The two versions appear identical to me. That edit and the user's repeated attempts at block evasion are pushing me towards the opinion that this user has been less than sincere regarding their motives. I really don't know how to proceed from here but I wanted you to know about my concerns. Regards Tiderolls 03:09, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

The talk page version was his challenge: showing to me that he could at least write constructively. He put over 160 edits into it to get it to his view of perfection. It doesn't surprise me that he's trying to get the live article to match it. I'm keeping my eye out for socking, and I have some technical measures in place to reduce its probability. The real goal is to see if I can get him to discuss things. I still have my fingers crossed.—Kww(talk) 03:14, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm kinda chuckling at "broke talk page rules"...and a bit at the dutch cite-error message, too. I appreciate that your on the job and have no concerns there. Thanks for taking the time to respond. Tiderolls 03:22, 28 February 2012 (UTC) I swear I saw some dutch here...oh, well...maybe it's a 70's flashback

It's a weird glitch. Whenever I edit a talk page that has a ref in it, I get that error because the Dutch user interface doesn't have the suppression code in it that the English interface does. The next time an editor with an English interface hits the same page, the message mysteriously vanishes.—Kww(talk) 11:09, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Civility Barnstar

		Civility Award
		For continuing to show civility when others might have felt the time for civility had passed. Richhoncho (talk) 09:05, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Re:Phoenix

You are welcome Kevin. But I do think you are being harsh. Everyday I see thousands of IPs writing foul words on Misplaced Pages. And yet all that is done is giving them a warning or simply nothing. Frankly, I think you should unblock him. You can... hmm maybe apply some restrictions as blocking someone repeatedly kind of discourages editors. Nevertheless, I know you are a good person and I understood all the rules and regulations here only after being blocked thrice. Lol. Your job as an admin is really nice. Keep it up. Cheers, Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

I just looked at that. I am sure he will become a good editor as for a beginner, he does not add original research and most amazingly he formats his references flawlessly. :) e will learn with time just like we all did. :D Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:53, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Re:Vandalism accusations

Check her discography page tell me where she has soundtrack singles? I don't need this crap and I don't need everyone contradicting what I do I know what the h*ll I'm doing I've been on here long enough to know a great deal. So people need to back off me! Just cause my accounts new doesn't mean I haven't edited before as I said I use to be under User:JamesAlan1986 until it go blocked for compromising and if you check the contributions on there I have been a pretty good editor on here. I just don't like people who break the rules. Swifty*_contribs 17:21, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Threaten me all you want that was no good faith edit. First off you looked at the pages and again chose to pick and choose what you looked at, each infobox on "Crazier", "Today Was a Fairytale" and "Safe & Sound" all say they are promotional singles NOT official singles and the template has been vandalized several times prior to and this one was no different. To put them as Soundtrack singles when they aren't even official was not how we do things here so maybe YOU should look at yourself and look at what I see and what OTHERS would see looking at pages and looking at the template and most would call it vandalizm. Swifty*_contribs 19:16, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

National Report - Colombia

I think I found some reliable sources that references Colombia's "National Report" on WT:Record Charts. Erick (talk) 20:40, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Whoops, yeah I caught that. I'll use WP:CHARTS instead. Thanks for the heads up. Erick (talk) 02:25, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Request for comments

Hello, you are welcome to contribute to the following page.

WP:Requests for comment/TBrandley

Thanks.

Logical Cowboy (talk) 05:56, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

As you are online

Can you block 70.52.172.51 (talk · contribs)? Please consider that this is a really long-term troll and always abuse of his talkpage (70.52.173.182 (talk · contribs)). Thank you. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 23:45, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Nevermind, MS already blocked. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 23:47, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

TBrandley

Can you tell me how this user has the Chelsea crest on their userpage in the corner? I would like to remove it and warn them about fair use but digging through the templates and page I cannot locate it. This userbox is also against fair use because it uses the show's logo. Nate • (chatter) 06:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Dug it up and found it it some Navigation template finally, sorry to have disturbed. User has been warned. Nate • (chatter) 06:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Bubbling Under

How is it synthesis that the Bubbling Under is an extension of the Hot 100? Most other discographies use figures of 1xx for Bubbling Under peaks, and this is a common indication in the industry — Joel Whitburn uses 1xx peaks to indicate Bubbling Under peaks. Ten Pound Hammer • 08:15, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

• What if the artist has only bubblers and no actual Hot 100 action? Is a "Bubbling Under" column acceptable? Seems like that'd make more sense than a bunch of footnotes. Ten Pound Hammer • 18:50, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

• If it's an independent column, no problem, so long as they are listed as 1-25 (not 101-125).—Kww(talk) 18:52, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Just letting you know...

When you unblocked TBrandley (talk · contribs) saying that if there were any more new redirect or articles created by the user, the block would be reinstated. However, he has created a redirect and is apparent also an article. Please review the user's contributions. I just wanted to let you know --Bmusician 14:58, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure about the above, but he did create the redirect Nickelodeon Croatia today. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 21:52, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Kww, thanks for all your efforts on this. The editor seems to have moved to Simple Misplaced Pages. Maybe this is an appropriate outcome. Or is this just evading a block? I wanted to bring it to your attention, anyway.

Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:54, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Nadia Oh

Hi, Kevin. A user who goes by Jonnylovesvegas (talk · contribs) keeps changing/removing content at Nadia Oh without providing any reason whatsoever, and has been doing so for quite a while. An IP user, 79.71.83.26 (talk · contribs), has displayed a suspiciously similar behaviour. Both have been warned but neither has ceased making unconstructive edits. Care to do something about it? Thanks in advance. SnapSnap 23:38, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Got it, thank you. SnapSnap 16:49, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Apparently it was more than just image policy violation. They just keep blindly reverting. SnapSnap 23:17, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Is this....

Special:Contributions/77.29.29.87 Phoenix again? - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:10, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Geolocates to Macedonia and has apparently used other IPs in the range, so likely lives there. Seems unrelated to me. Amalthea 20:27, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Alright, thank you. The edit summaries just sounded like him along with the formatting of refs. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:36, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Lime Pictures and Hollyoaks

Howdy, thanks for your quick block of Limepictures (talk · contribs). I'm not sure it would be safe to call that a content dispute, my assessment of it yesterday was a PR person trying to put his press release in place of the two articles (both unencyclopedic and a copyvio), see Misplaced Pages:ANI#Advertising_in_article. My plan was to block the PR person's main account IndieTVIndustryInsider (talk · contribs), but if you think it is a legitimate content dispute I can hold off. Thanks, --TeaDrinker (talk) 14:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Seems reasonable. Thanks! --TeaDrinker (talk) 15:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

-- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 12:07, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

TBrandley's IP

Hello Kww. I had a question about TBrandley (talk · contribs · logs). I know that his main account and secondary account Tate.B.Stockwell (talk · contribs · logs) have beeen blocked indefinitely, but I noticed that the IP address he has admitted to using (99.199.87.29 (talk · contribs · info · WHOIS)) is only blocked for a week (expiring tomorrow, Sunday). I do not know the rules about applying blocks, but shouldn't this IP block be longer, too? Otherwise tomorrow he can just create a new account and start his havoc all over again. (At least until we recognize him and file an SPI.) Just wondering if the block could be extended. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 00:20, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

One Direction album page Up All Night (One Direction album) vanadalism

Could you semi protect the album page because of persistent vandalism an unregistered user keeps deleting charts, i have to revert everyday. I tried showing him WP:BADCHARTS. Semi protection would beneficent for page because only registered users contribute. Could you please semi protect Up All Night (One Direction album) like with Gotta Be You, One Thing, What Makes You Beautiful and their main page. I also think it's necessary because they're becoming insanely popular. they're album is positioned to debut a top the billboard 200. please semi protect

 AdabowtheSecond (talk) 13:41, 11 March 2012 (UTC)AbabowtheSecond

Response to your response

i did examine. i thought they're management would be good enough and examined the WP:BADCHARTS and i didn't say anything about wrong about the singapore, hong kong charts and unregisterd editor also removes aussie/nz year end charts. "my life will be better" my wikipedia edit life you mean. nothing personal here — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdabowtheSecond (talk • contribs) 18:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Some cleanup

Could you also delete the redirect at --Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:01, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

User changed links in a navbox which is what created the many links to the deleted redirect that you restored. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:06, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

COI block

I guess there's not much for you to add, but just showing you this as you were the blocking admin: Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/IndieTVIndustryInsider. Cheers. WilliamH (talk) 18:16, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Muhammad images

I think the Rfc is nearly finalized, but only a few editors have commented recently, not including you. Could you take a look & let us know what you think at Misplaced Pages:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/11_February_2012/Muhammad-images#Finalizing_Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment.2FMuhammad_images. Thanks. Johnbod (talk) 14:51, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Barbara Grizzuti Harrison as a RS

Interesting comment here as an editor accuses you of edit warring in order to "get your views posted in the article." I think I might take this to the RSN and gain some opinions there. This discussion is going nowhere. BlackCab (talk) 04:16, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

FYI

The sockpuppetry accusation made by User:Dreadstar against the IP in the content dispute on Talk:What the Bleep Do We Know!? (in which you also took part) is now being discussed on ANI. ASCIIn2Bme (talk) 05:23, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Notability

Hi Kevin. I don't edit Misplaced Pages very often now but there's something that has been bugging me for a long time. Using a single chart (like Korean Gaon chart, R&B/Hip-Hop songs chart etc.) to prove the notability of a song/single. They're reliable charts indeed, but if this keeps up, there will be lots of articles, including permanent stubs, on songs. I think the community should discuss this issue. Ryōga Hibiki (talk • contribs) 07:45, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Your pending desysop

Kww, I've noted in the ANI thread you started re: Colonel Warden how egregiously wrong your interpretation of his edit summary is. I've also called upon you to apologize in your forthcoming unblock summary and resign the tools immediately. The choice whether to do that, defend your original blocking rationale, or do something entirely different is really in your court. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 07:18, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

• Kevin, I don't support a desysop, but I also didn't support the block on the Colonel. I went as far as undoing it, and have explained at ANI why I did so--something I've never done before, I don't think. I'm sorry, but I felt like it was the right thing to do, in spite of the many years I have worked with and agreed with you. I hope you can understand my position. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 16:39, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

How can I create a singlechart template for Media Forest?

You created {{singlechart|Israelairplay|position|year=year|week=week}} for the chart, how can I change the name of the chart to "Israel (Media Forest)"instead of "Israeli Airplay (Media Forest)"? And once again, thank you for adding the chart. 2pac Is Alive (talk) 19:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Why there is no link to Media Forest? 2pac Is Alive (talk) 12:50, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/(CA)Giacobbe

Can you do something about this user? He keeps removing sources, and changing genres to whatever he feels like. He also personally attacked me. — Status {_contribs 01:02, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

User:Nusacc

Hi, I noticed you blocked and reverted based on WP:SOCK. Can you give a brief rationale for that please? --John (talk) 18:12, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

I e-mailed my rationale. I don't like to publish my lists of recognizable characteristics.—Kww(talk) 18:44, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, I am inclined to agree with you. --John (talk) 19:24, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

RE: Blue Monday

I added a "reliable source on the subject of the song". Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:56, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Comment?

Hi. I was wondering if you'd mind commenting here about review content for MDNA (album). The reception section has turned into a bloated mess with quotes from tabloid and lifestyle magazines. But at this point, it's a content dispute, so Im not doing jack without a consensus. Dan56 (talk) 03:27, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

IF YOU'RE GONNA PUT CRAP UP FOR DELETION

Put that up for deletion and back off my edits! I'm a damn good editor and I'm getting sick of feeling harassed on here. You sit here and make me out to be this person who isn't a good faith editor when I am when it's actually people like you who aren't now I'm going to get that page kept and you need to back off me and do more constructive work on taking down pages like the one I linked to you. Do not reply to me either I have nothing to say to you. Swifty*_contribs 15:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

I had good faith when Fastily warned the user of disruptive editing that the situation on "Blue" was done but NO another admin goes and starts a page that shouldn't have existed and then everyone one wants to bash on me for having good faith that what I pointed out would be listened to and that the situation was taken care of prior to it but NO people did what they wanted and BASHED me for doing the right thing and I'm sick of this. Misplaced Pages will eventually get shut down. Everything on here is copyright infringement regardless of those little disclaimers we put. We don't have permission from anyone to use copyrighted material on here and that'll end Misplaced Pages. The other thing that'll end it is it's unreliable! As I pointed out in your little attempt to get under my skin when I had good faith that the article was fine as it was and was ready for future adding of information, my significant other's mother told me that she's not allowed to use Misplaced Pages at school because people post whatever they want and it's not reliable. This site allows too much to happen and its what you did that proves it. I'm done! Misplaced Pages is going to get shut down anyway so I'm just not getting back on here anymore what's the point if this will eventually get shut down. Swifty*_contribs 15:48, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Okay I'm going to ask you again NICELY to back off! Swifty*_contribs 16:30, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Okay you were warned I told you back off and you won't YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO STOP ME FROM USING Author requests deletion and I'm reporting you for hounding I ain't playing with you anymore. I told you WP:POINT has nothing to do with this and you are being disrespectful to me and taking away my rights. Swifty*_contribs 16:47, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User:Swifty, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. I'm done playing this is your only warning back off me Swifty*_contribs 17:04, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Kww has never edited that page: see here. Jakew (talk) 17:08, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Swifty is interpreting a warning from an admin as a personal attack: see here.—Kww(talk) 17:15, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Ah. Well, if that's a personal attack then I'm a baked potato. Jakew (talk) 17:17, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Dude you are hounding me and watching me everywhere I've turn so yes you are personally attacking me and here's you're notice that I'm done with you and you need to leave me alone. Swifty*_contribs 17:19, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

User talk:2pac Is Alive/Media Forest

I've finished the article. I used some third-party sources, let me know what you think. 2pac Is Alive (talk) 13:26, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Maria

Is back as 81.151.32.34 (talk · contribs), shouldn't Take a Chance on Me (JLS song) be protected? Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:29, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

You need to stop assuming!

It's quite apparent from review of this unblock discussion, your recent edits, and edits under previous accounts that you have difficulty editing calmly and cooperatively.

That right there that you said IS WRONG! I am very cooperative thank you ask Status, Fastily, Novice, and a few others who I have mentioned on my user page can vogue for that as they do right by users on Misplaced Pages. Sh*t me and status have had a few scraps before but we always work it out. See there are those on here who I respect cause they know I am trying to do my best on here and then there are those like you who will assume things and basically hound and spy on what a good faith editor like myself tries to do. And by the way how dare you go by my JamesAlan account being blocked for being compromised, that was cause my significant other doesn't want to have an account on here and didn't like how I've been treated which from everything I've told him he's not thrilled with you bothering me. He at least believes that I'm trying to do right by Misplaced Pages and has discouraged me from being on here cause of editors like you. So yes you do need to stop monitoring me because he's already threatened to report Misplaced Pages cause people shouldn't get away with harrassing other editors in anyway and then when caught in the act try to make themselves look good when they are indeed doing wrong. Swifty*_contribs 19:57, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

I can see me and OhioStandard getting along and possibly me and Beeblebrox could get along cause they were nice to me. You and me, we're not gonna get along I'm sorry. Not after you and Moriori and did what you did with "Blue". As I stated after what Fastily did I assumed in good faith the situation was handled but you did not wanted to listen to that and assume and make me feel like an idiot and then after that you won't back off me so no when you do as you're doing then yes there's going to be problems but I'll be fine if I don't feel like you're up my a** for a lack of a better term. But I'm done with this if you keep monitoring me I'm not responsible for my significant others actions okay? As I said I doubt I'll be making hardly any major editing on here anymore in fact what I put on The Hunger Games soundtrack and Spitfire. is all I'm doing for today other then telling you you need to stop making assumptions and accusations as you have with me, I'm fine on Misplaced Pages as long as I ain't being treated like a dog and you monitoring my ever edit will cause problems cause I don't like it or want you to. See that's how I work you treat me wrong and you do things I believe are wrong as you are that's where problems start up. I didn't ask you to check my edits, etc. and until I do you have no right to do that. So I'm asking you nice to please stop cause otherwise yes there will be problems. Swifty*_contribs 20:11, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Single vendor chart

Just to inform you, in case you didn't know: Chartsinfrance.net is the official publisher of French music charts. The link you removed for "Sorry for Party Rocking" shows the entire chart history of the song. It is not a single vendor chart or a "second-hand" site à la Hung Medien which usually lacks behind in their updates.

New singles charts are updated on Fridays at Chartsinfrance.net, but Top 50 is revealed on Tuesdays at http://musique.premiere.fr/TOP-50. And that update is now showing chart position 16 for this song. Widr (talk) 20:05, 27 March 2012 (UTC)