Revision as of 09:58, 26 March 2012 view sourceCkatz (talk | contribs)Administrators82,942 edits tweak← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:51, 29 March 2012 view source Fuhghettaboutit (talk | contribs)85,115 edits Per request on talk page; seems quite reasonable and adds clarityNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Display/watchlist |until=19 April |cookie=117 |text=The ] on image use within the Muhammad article as requested by the ] is now open for discussion. }} | {{Display/watchlist |until=19 April |cookie=117 |text=The ] on image use within the Muhammad article as requested by the ] is now open for discussion. }} | ||
{{Display/watchlist |until=23 April |cookie=118 |text=A ] is under way to decide the future of ]. }} | {{Display/watchlist |until=23 April |cookie=118 |text=A ] is under way to decide the future of ]. }} | ||
{{Display/watchlist |until=24 April |cookie=119 |text=The ] on the |
{{Display/watchlist |until=24 April |cookie=119 |text=The ] on the title of two abortion-related articles, as requested by the ], is now open for voting by the community. Please consider providing your opinion.}} | ||
<!--{{Display/watchlist | <!--{{Display/watchlist | ||
|until= | |until= |
Revision as of 21:51, 29 March 2012
- The community discussion on image use within the Muhammad article as requested by the Arbitration Committee is now open for discussion.
- A request for comment is under way to decide the future of pending changes.
- The RFC on the title of two abortion-related articles, as requested by the Arbitration Committee, is now open for voting by the community. Please consider providing your opinion.
You have $1 pages on your watchlist (excluding talk pages).