Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/List of alumina refineries: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:58, 31 March 2012 editAndy Dingley (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers160,529 edits k← Previous edit Revision as of 21:51, 31 March 2012 edit undoAlan Liefting (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers134,250 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:
* '''Keep''' No comprehensible nomination. * '''Keep''' No comprehensible nomination.
: Alumina refineries are significant pieces of engineering. They will (as does any construction of such scale) be fairly easy to demonstrate notability for. Each one also consumes considerable electrical power, has large quantities of raw materials shipped to it, and has a risk of environmental damage from their effluents. The locations of such plants are entirely proper topics for encyclopedic coverage. ] (]) 09:58, 31 March 2012 (UTC) : Alumina refineries are significant pieces of engineering. They will (as does any construction of such scale) be fairly easy to demonstrate notability for. Each one also consumes considerable electrical power, has large quantities of raw materials shipped to it, and has a risk of environmental damage from their effluents. The locations of such plants are entirely proper topics for encyclopedic coverage. ] (]) 09:58, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

::The policy at ] should be a comprehensible reason enough reason for deletion in both specifics and in "spirit". I am not denying that alumina plants are significant although ''how'' significant is the question. It is interesting to note that none of the refineries have their own article. -- ] (] - ]) 21:51, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:51, 31 March 2012

List of alumina refineries

List of alumina refineries (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep No comprehensible nomination.
Alumina refineries are significant pieces of engineering. They will (as does any construction of such scale) be fairly easy to demonstrate notability for. Each one also consumes considerable electrical power, has large quantities of raw materials shipped to it, and has a risk of environmental damage from their effluents. The locations of such plants are entirely proper topics for encyclopedic coverage. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:58, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
The policy at WP:NOT should be a comprehensible reason enough reason for deletion in both specifics and in "spirit". I am not denying that alumina plants are significant although how significant is the question. It is interesting to note that none of the refineries have their own article. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 21:51, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of alumina refineries: Difference between revisions Add topic