| Revision as of 13:26, 26 March 2012 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 14d) to User talk:Bittergrey/Archive 2.← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:01, 2 April 2012 edit undoWLU (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers52,243 edits →Edit warring at paraphilic infantilism: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| Bittergrey, Hi. There is an ongoing controversy at the ] page that you might want to comment on. I'm mentioning this to you as you've taken some interest in the article in the past. ] (]) 06:49, 24 March 2012 (UTC) | Bittergrey, Hi. There is an ongoing controversy at the ] page that you might want to comment on. I'm mentioning this to you as you've taken some interest in the article in the past. ] (]) 06:49, 24 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Edit warring at ] == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] <small>] ] Misplaced Pages's rules:</small>]/] 11:01, 2 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:01, 2 April 2012
 My Talk Archives CAMH_Promotion | |||
|
|||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Andrea James
Bittergrey, Hi. There is an ongoing controversy at the Andrea James page that you might want to comment on. I'm mentioning this to you as you've taken some interest in the article in the past. Luwat (talk) 06:49, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Edit warring at paraphilic infantilism
Your recent editing history at paraphilic infantilism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. WLU (t) (c) Misplaced Pages's rules:/complex 11:01, 2 April 2012 (UTC)