Revision as of 06:50, 4 March 2012 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,378,138 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:OsamaK/February 2012. (BOT)← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:35, 2 April 2012 edit undoJimbo Wales (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Founder14,538 edits →Alexa Bot: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
<!--:<h1 style="border: none; font-variant: small-caps; font-weight: bold; line-height: 1.2; text-align: center;">Don't tell me that sources are not required for ]. We do have ]!</h1>--> | <!--:<h1 style="border: none; font-variant: small-caps; font-weight: bold; line-height: 1.2; text-align: center;">Don't tell me that sources are not required for ]. We do have ]!</h1>--> | ||
== Alexa Bot == | |||
Hi Osama! Long time, no chat! | |||
I'm curious as to what you might think about generally replacing alexa statistics throughout English Misplaced Pages with quantcast numbers. In the industry, Quantcast numbers are considered to be much more accurate, and Alexa numbers to be highly questionable. At the very least, I wonder what the possibility might be of updating these numbers in infoboxes to include both, rather than Alexa alone.--] (]) 11:35, 2 April 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:35, 2 April 2012
Archives | ||
Index
| ||
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
Alexa Bot
Hi Osama! Long time, no chat!
I'm curious as to what you might think about generally replacing alexa statistics throughout English Misplaced Pages with quantcast numbers. In the industry, Quantcast numbers are considered to be much more accurate, and Alexa numbers to be highly questionable. At the very least, I wonder what the possibility might be of updating these numbers in infoboxes to include both, rather than Alexa alone.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 11:35, 2 April 2012 (UTC)