| Revision as of 11:43, 7 April 2012 view sourceTopGun (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers20,007 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:17, 7 April 2012 view source Darkness Shines (talk | contribs)31,762 edits →Balochistan conflict: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| Please see ] and ]. Participation appriciated. Drop a note to other interested active editors you know. --<span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">] (])</span> 11:43, 7 April 2012 (UTC) | Please see ] and ]. Participation appriciated. Drop a note to other interested active editors you know. --<span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">] (])</span> 11:43, 7 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Balochistan conflict == | |||
| You have broken your 1RR restriction on this article, please self revert. ] (]) 12:17, 7 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:17, 7 April 2012
WP:RSN - Siasat on Ahmadiyya
Hi. I'm responding to a query on the Reliable Sources Noticeboard, about a disagreement about the use of Siasat as a reliable source for some lines in the article Ahmadiyya. There were some unfortunate words written, but hopefully we can put that behind us and discuss the issue more civilly. Can we discuss the source at Misplaced Pages:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Siasat_on_Ahmadiyya? Thanks. --GRuban (talk) 14:16, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Gilgit-Baltistan
Could you explain this revert on the talk page or somewhere else? I don't understand what you're objecting to and why. Shrigley (talk) 20:55, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Attia Bano Qamar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Attia Bano Qamar is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Attia Bano Qamar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Grrahnbahr (talk) 16:46, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Accusations
A heads up for these accusations... I'm confident there isn't even an appearance of canvassing here, just "I don't like it, so I'll admin-shop". --lTopGunl (talk) 17:17, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Pakistan/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2012
Please see Misplaced Pages talk:Notice board for Pakistan-related topics#Assessments for Pakistan related articles and Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Pakistan/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2012. Participation appriciated. Drop a note to other interested active editors you know. --lTopGunl (talk) 11:43, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Balochistan conflict
You have broken your 1RR restriction on this article, please self revert. Darkness Shines (talk) 12:17, 7 April 2012 (UTC)