Revision as of 06:32, 8 April 2012 editGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →April 2014: Yeah, sure, you were trying to remove it...← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:49, 8 April 2012 edit undoChaotic Void (talk | contribs)7 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing because your account is ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 06:32, 8 April 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-voablock --> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing because your account is ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 06:32, 8 April 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-voablock --> | ||
{{unblock|reason= I can already see that page has some problematic edits to it. I removed it with my first edit. The edit I'm sure you are questioning it my second. If I did this correctly you will see I tried to go back to the same edit make by the robot. http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Frank_Iero&diff=486211285&oldid=486210981 I tried to fix it in my third edit, but it did not seem to help. My 4th edit seemed to help. I thought the vandalism was recent, but you fixed it by going back to an edit made last week. I'm sorry. ] (]) 06:49, 8 April 2012 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 06:49, 8 April 2012
April 2014
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:28, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:32, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
Chaotic Void (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I can already see that page has some problematic edits to it. I removed it with my first edit. The edit I'm sure you are questioning it my second. If I did this correctly you will see I tried to go back to the same edit make by the robot. http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Frank_Iero&diff=486211285&oldid=486210981 I tried to fix it in my third edit, but it did not seem to help. My 4th edit seemed to help. I thought the vandalism was recent, but you fixed it by going back to an edit made last week. I'm sorry. Chaotic Void (talk) 06:49, 8 April 2012 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I can already see that page has some problematic edits to it. I removed it with my first edit. The edit I'm sure you are questioning it my second. If I did this correctly you will see I tried to go back to the same edit make by the robot. http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Frank_Iero&diff=486211285&oldid=486210981 I tried to fix it in my third edit, but it did not seem to help. My 4th edit seemed to help. I thought the vandalism was recent, but you fixed it by going back to an edit made last week. I'm sorry. ] (]) 06:49, 8 April 2012 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I can already see that page has some problematic edits to it. I removed it with my first edit. The edit I'm sure you are questioning it my second. If I did this correctly you will see I tried to go back to the same edit make by the robot. http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Frank_Iero&diff=486211285&oldid=486210981 I tried to fix it in my third edit, but it did not seem to help. My 4th edit seemed to help. I thought the vandalism was recent, but you fixed it by going back to an edit made last week. I'm sorry. ] (]) 06:49, 8 April 2012 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I can already see that page has some problematic edits to it. I removed it with my first edit. The edit I'm sure you are questioning it my second. If I did this correctly you will see I tried to go back to the same edit make by the robot. http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Frank_Iero&diff=486211285&oldid=486210981 I tried to fix it in my third edit, but it did not seem to help. My 4th edit seemed to help. I thought the vandalism was recent, but you fixed it by going back to an edit made last week. I'm sorry. ] (]) 06:49, 8 April 2012 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}