Revision as of 06:49, 8 April 2012 editChaotic Void (talk | contribs)7 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:19, 8 April 2012 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits ReviewedNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== April |
== April 2012 == | ||
] This is your '''only warning'''; if you ] Misplaced Pages again, you may be '''] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning4 --> -- ] (]) 06:28, 8 April 2012 (UTC) | ] This is your '''only warning'''; if you ] Misplaced Pages again, you may be '''] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning4 --> -- ] (]) 06:28, 8 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing because your account is ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 06:32, 8 April 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-voablock --> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing because your account is ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 06:32, 8 April 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-voablock --> | ||
{{unblock| |
{{unblock reviewed|1= I can already see that page has some problematic edits to it. I removed it with my first edit. The edit I'm sure you are questioning it my second. If I did this correctly you will see I tried to go back to the same edit make by the robot. http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Frank_Iero&diff=486211285&oldid=486210981 I tried to fix it in my third edit, but it did not seem to help. My 4th edit seemed to help. I thought the vandalism was recent, but you fixed it by going back to an edit made last week. I'm sorry. ] (]) 06:49, 8 April 2012 (UTC)|accept=See below.}} | ||
:Actually, as another admin pointed out to me, I never actually blocked you. I only notified that I had blocked you. However, upon further consideration, I do believe that you were trying to correct the rapid vandalism by anonymous editors that was going on with the article. Please accept my sincerest apologies for grouping you in with all of editors trying to attack Frank Iero. -- ] (]) 07:19, 8 April 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:19, 8 April 2012
April 2012
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:28, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:32, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
Chaotic Void (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I can already see that page has some problematic edits to it. I removed it with my first edit. The edit I'm sure you are questioning it my second. If I did this correctly you will see I tried to go back to the same edit make by the robot. http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Frank_Iero&diff=486211285&oldid=486210981 I tried to fix it in my third edit, but it did not seem to help. My 4th edit seemed to help. I thought the vandalism was recent, but you fixed it by going back to an edit made last week. I'm sorry. Chaotic Void (talk) 06:49, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Accept reason:
See below.
- Actually, as another admin pointed out to me, I never actually blocked you. I only notified that I had blocked you. However, upon further consideration, I do believe that you were trying to correct the rapid vandalism by anonymous editors that was going on with the article. Please accept my sincerest apologies for grouping you in with all of editors trying to attack Frank Iero. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:19, 8 April 2012 (UTC)