| Revision as of 10:31, 16 April 2006 editThe Minister of War (talk | contribs)1,763 edits moving discussion← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:32, 16 April 2006 edit undoThe Minister of War (talk | contribs)1,763 editsm →RDH's contributions.: linkNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == RDH's contributions. == | == RDH's contributions. == | ||
| I'll make a seperate page ] so you'll have some workspace and it won't fill up your talk page. Peace. ] 18:11, 15 April 2006 (UTC) | I'll make a seperate page ] so you'll have some workspace and it won't fill up your talk page. Peace. ] 18:11, 15 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :ok, I've put all his uploads there, removed any that were redlinks, some seem to have been deleted but the page is still there, I don't know why. A few of his images I have no real issue with and I've marked them "np" on the list. You can just remove them from the list if you'd like. Some of his images (including clear copyvios) have been moved to the commons, so I guess they'll have to be deleted there. Some he's given a website source (who are almost certainly not the copyright holders), in some he's said "with permission" then tagged it as free. Given his history of dishonesty, I wouldn't take his word for it that permission was gotten, and it's not clear if it's a wp only permission. On one there's a pretty detailed source, and it's free if it's true, but again I simply don't believe him. ] 18:32, 15 April 2006 (UTC) | :ok, I've put all his uploads there, removed any that were redlinks, some seem to have been deleted but the page is still there, I don't know why. A few of his images I have no real issue with and I've marked them "np" on the list. You can just remove them from the list if you'd like. Some of his images (including clear copyvios) have been moved to the commons, so I guess they'll have to be deleted there. Some he's given a website source (who are almost certainly not the copyright holders), in some he's said "with permission" then tagged it as free. Given his history of dishonesty, I wouldn't take his word for it that permission was gotten, and it's not clear if it's a wp only permission. On one there's a pretty detailed source, and it's free if it's true, but again I simply don't believe him. ] 18:32, 15 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::Hi, are you aware that according to ] the {pd-art} tag is used only when the artist has been dead for more than 100 years? And not when an artist has been dead for 14? ] 01:55, 16 April 2006 (UTC) | ::Hi, are you aware that according to ] the {pd-art} tag is used only when the artist has been dead for more than 100 years? And not when an artist has been dead for 14? ] 01:55, 16 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 10:32, 16 April 2006
RDH's contributions.
I'll make a seperate page /RDH so you'll have some workspace and it won't fill up your talk page. Peace. Matt 18:11, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
- ok, I've put all his uploads there, removed any that were redlinks, some seem to have been deleted but the page is still there, I don't know why. A few of his images I have no real issue with and I've marked them "np" on the list. You can just remove them from the list if you'd like. Some of his images (including clear copyvios) have been moved to the commons, so I guess they'll have to be deleted there. Some he's given a website source (who are almost certainly not the copyright holders), in some he's said "with permission" then tagged it as free. Given his history of dishonesty, I wouldn't take his word for it that permission was gotten, and it's not clear if it's a wp only permission. On one there's a pretty detailed source, and it's free if it's true, but again I simply don't believe him. Matt 18:32, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
- Hi, are you aware that according to Misplaced Pages:Image_copyright_tags#Public_domain_art the {pd-art} tag is used only when the artist has been dead for more than 100 years? And not when an artist has been dead for 14? Matt 01:55, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
- And I'm not too sure about USMA. Their main page has a copyright notice and their policy page only permits non-commercial use. Matt 02:09, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
- Errr last I checked, Misplaced Pages was NON-COMMERCIAL. Also, we have discussed this matter over on WP Mil History Project (Which is not the same BTW without our Minister of War:). And it was determined that we had the "Point's" permission, if not their actual blessing. Incidently, Matty, I'm being reasonable now, and accepting of of my mistakes as well as yours...why do you insist on wasting our time by continuing to be a Phallus towards me. So please, either be reasonable, file an Rfc or leave me the hell alone.--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 02:44, 16 April 2006 (UTC)