| Revision as of 18:55, 24 April 2012 editMalik Shabazz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers106,163 edits →Talk:OLT Express: done← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:03, 24 April 2012 edit undoElliotJoyce (talk | contribs)256 edits →ElliotJoyce attackNext edit → | ||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
| :::::Thank you for your input. Your own Euro-supremacist biases are so obvious that everybody can see them but you. | :::::Thank you for your input. Your own Euro-supremacist biases are so obvious that everybody can see them but you. | ||
| :::::Ackees' edits appear to be a particular target of yours. Please stop ]ing Ackees, as she/he has asked you, or the matter will be referred elsewhere. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 18:24, 24 April 2012 (UTC) | :::::Ackees' edits appear to be a particular target of yours. Please stop ]ing Ackees, as she/he has asked you, or the matter will be referred elsewhere. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 18:24, 24 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ::::::Euro-supremacist? And how exactly is that, Mr. Shabazz? Your accusation here is tantamount to racism, and I am having difficulty finding where I have engaged in behavior warranting such an accusation or anything approximate to it. Mr. Ackees' edits, as well as some of your own, reflect a stark anti-Europeanism that does not accord to the either neutrality or the sources. It seems like you're attempting to cover for either yourself or Mr. Ackees by portraying me as a "Euro-supremacist", when in fact, if you observe the history of my edits, they are an attempt to correct the information per the sources provided and to instill a greater, not a lesser, neutral point of view. For example, your history on the ] page and the ] page marks your bias quiet well- you completely overlooked the unsourced anti-European information, while denigraitng the sourced pro-European information. On top of this, the pages you cited for Mr. Williams' Slavery and Capitalism do not justify the information appearing in the article regarding Mr. Williams. And I am the "supremacist"? Right....] (]) 19:03, 24 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Talk:OLT Express== | ==Talk:OLT Express== | ||
Revision as of 19:03, 24 April 2012
 |
|
 | Are you here because I deleted your article? Please read this before you leave me a message. |
| This is Malik Shabazz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 5 days  |
|
Search the Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Talk:Anti-Polish_sentiment#B-class_review
I wonder if you'd be interested in reading and reviewing this article? It is not mine, but I just don't feel competent to judge its neutrality, particularly the likely pro-Polish bias. I was thinking of posting it to WT:POLAND, but after second thought, I realized you are the only person who does the reviews, and who is also most likely to be neutral. If you are not interested in this, feel free to decline, of course. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 19:09, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. I am in fact going to fail the article for insufficient citations, but if you'd like to comment on neutrality, it would still be appreciated. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 20:30, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Malcolm Shabazz
We seem to have edit-conflicted. I was trying to fix my previous mistake, but I'm unsure which of my edits you were rolling back. I was attempting to capitalize "Hajj", which is how I usually see it written. If it's suposed to be lowercase, by all means revert it. Thanks. Joefromrandb (talk) 03:16, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry for the conflict. I reverted an edit from earlier in the day that added a line break. I don't care about upper or lower case. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 03:19, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. Joefromrandb (talk) 03:24, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
User:Timmy96
Hello, I noticed that you deleted Talk:Timmy96. It appears that Timmy96 (talk · contribs) moved his user page into article space sometime before you deleted it. The user now appears to want his user talk page deleted, despite several users telling him that it won't be. The question I have for you is, what was on the Talk:Timmy96 page when you deleted it, or is there any lengthy history behind it? I don't see any indication of other misconduct by this user, but I can't help but wonder if this was an attempt to hide user warnings. Any light you could shed on this would be appreciated. Thanks. —KuyaBriBri 20:12, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- When I deleted it, I thought Talk:Timmy96 was the same as User talk:Timmy96. I see now that it wasn't and I shouldn't have deleted it. It has a welcome message, four disambiguation bot notifications, and a speedy deletion notification concerning Timmy96. There is a single warning message, for adding unsupported information to a BLP (Herita Ilunga) dated April 3.
- I'll fix the deletion and restore the edits to User talk:Timmy96. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 23:30, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 April 2012
- Investigative report: Spin doctors spin Jimmy's "bright line"
- WikiProject report: Skeptics and Believers: WikiProject The X-Files
- Featured content: A mirror (or seventeen) on this week's featured content
- Arbitration report: Evidence submissions close in Rich Farmbrough case, vote on proposed decision in R&I Review
- Technology report: Wikimedia Labs: soon to be at the cutting edge of MediaWiki development?
ElliotJoyce attack
I looked at my watchlist and a user called ElliotJoyce has been systematically going through all my edits and reverting them on politically sensitive pages. I see you've had dealings, too...Ackees (talk) 14:09, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, it looks like he's been WP:WIKIHOUNDing you. You may want to ask him to stop. If it continues, consider asking an uninvolved administrator to tell him to stop, or try WP:Dispute resolution. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 14:19, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the advice, I've asked them to stop, and have reported them. But, somehow I think this is going to last... Ackees (talk) 14:22, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- If you observe the reverts I have made regarding Mr. Ackees, you will see that his edits are biased, mostly anti-European wording that damages the neutrality of the articles in question. My edits are not for the purposes of harassment, but rather for correction. One example is the African Slave Trade article, where Mr. Ackees persistently changed the information presented to read the opposite of what the source said. He has committed similar purposeful distortions on other articles, and if push comes to shove, I will defend the neutrality of the articles over Mr. Ackees unjustified input. Thank you. ElliotJoyce (talk) 18:18, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the advice, I've asked them to stop, and have reported them. But, somehow I think this is going to last... Ackees (talk) 14:22, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for your input. Your own Euro-supremacist biases are so obvious that everybody can see them but you.
- Ackees' edits appear to be a particular target of yours. Please stop WIKIHOUNDing Ackees, as she/he has asked you, or the matter will be referred elsewhere. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 18:24, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- Euro-supremacist? And how exactly is that, Mr. Shabazz? Your accusation here is tantamount to racism, and I am having difficulty finding where I have engaged in behavior warranting such an accusation or anything approximate to it. Mr. Ackees' edits, as well as some of your own, reflect a stark anti-Europeanism that does not accord to the either neutrality or the sources. It seems like you're attempting to cover for either yourself or Mr. Ackees by portraying me as a "Euro-supremacist", when in fact, if you observe the history of my edits, they are an attempt to correct the information per the sources provided and to instill a greater, not a lesser, neutral point of view. For example, your history on the African Slave Trade page and the Atlantic Slave Trade page marks your bias quiet well- you completely overlooked the unsourced anti-European information, while denigraitng the sourced pro-European information. On top of this, the pages you cited for Mr. Williams' Slavery and Capitalism do not justify the information appearing in the article regarding Mr. Williams. And I am the "supremacist"? Right....ElliotJoyce (talk) 19:03, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Talk:OLT Express
You reverted my edit and now there are two talk pages for one article page: Talk:OLT express and Talk:OLT Express. Could you please delete one of them? --igor_alexandrov (talk) 18:49, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing it out. I've fixed it. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 18:55, 24 April 2012 (UTC)