| Revision as of 07:56, 28 April 2012 editErpert (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers48,367 editsm comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:47, 28 April 2012 edit undoFuture Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators87,218 edits →Janet Mason: dNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| *'''Keep''' passes ] criteria 2. --] ] 02:06, 27 April 2012 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' passes ] criteria 2. --] ] 02:06, 27 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :*one of the nominations is for a group scene shared with other seven actresses, it doesn't say much about her notability as an individual. --] (]) 17:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC) | :*one of the nominations is for a group scene shared with other seven actresses, it doesn't say much about her notability as an individual. --] (]) 17:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''': if this is covered by ], that only shows how ridiculously out of touch that "guideline" is with the rest of the project. People keep debating whether or not it is currently deprecated, but somebody gave a good answer to that on a similar Afd: it is precisely as deprecated as AfD participants decide it is. This very debate here, and several others, clearly demonstrate it currently has no consensus behind it, so it can be safely ignored. ] ] 08:47, 28 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:47, 28 April 2012
Janet Mason
- Janet Mason (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An in-universe description of a totally NN pornstar. Does not reach the general notability guidelines, nor those for entertainers. Hipocrite (talk) 19:14, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
- Strong keep. How is this in-universe, and what guidelines doesn't she pass? For starters, she passes WP:PORNBIO and WP:GNG. Erpert 06:09, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete All sources are non-notable porn websites (attempts by the porn industry to give itself publicity). AVN award is a promotional award by porn industry. WP:PORNBIO is too lax and it's under discussion in Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(people)#PORNBIO:_yes_or_no.3F_.28maybe.29. --Enric Naval (talk) 08:42, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- "Under discussion", yes, but it's still a guideline. Erpert 09:15, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per Hipocrite/nom and Enric Naval. --Sonicyouth86 (talk) 15:39, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- keep AVN is an industry award, but so are oscars, grammys, tonys, etc, and those all count. two nominations is sufficient. Gaijin42 (talk) 15:43, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- Those awards are far more notable than AVN award. --Enric Naval (talk) 17:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- To you, maybe. Erpert 07:56, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep passes WP:PORNBIO criteria 2. --SupernovaExplosion 02:06, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- one of the nominations is for a group scene shared with other seven actresses, it doesn't say much about her notability as an individual. --Enric Naval (talk) 17:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete: if this is covered by WP:PORNBIO, that only shows how ridiculously out of touch that "guideline" is with the rest of the project. People keep debating whether or not it is currently deprecated, but somebody gave a good answer to that on a similar Afd: it is precisely as deprecated as AfD participants decide it is. This very debate here, and several others, clearly demonstrate it currently has no consensus behind it, so it can be safely ignored. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:47, 28 April 2012 (UTC)