Revision as of 06:41, 27 April 2012 editErpert (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers48,367 editsm comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:59, 28 April 2012 edit undoFuture Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators87,218 edits →Elexis Monroe: dNext edit → | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>] (]) 19:04, 26 April 2012 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>] (]) 19:04, 26 April 2012 (UTC)</small> | ||
*'''Keep''' - Delete votes have flawed understanding of what makes an award notable. AVN is only part of and promotes the industry in the sense that they report on the industry as a trade journal and as porn critics. Besides the nominations passes the current version of PORNBIO and also under the proposed tightened version PORNBIO that is currently being discussed on ]. ] (]) 00:15, 27 April 2012 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' - Delete votes have flawed understanding of what makes an award notable. AVN is only part of and promotes the industry in the sense that they report on the industry as a trade journal and as porn critics. Besides the nominations passes the current version of PORNBIO and also under the proposed tightened version PORNBIO that is currently being discussed on ]. ] (]) 00:15, 27 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete''', no independent coverage outside the narrow sphere of the industry's self-promotion machinery, for which the author evidently wishes to create an outpost on Misplaced Pages. ] ] 09:59, 28 April 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:59, 28 April 2012
Elexis Monroe
- Elexis Monroe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A totally NN pornstar - does not even meet the not-guildeline PORNBIO Hipocrite (talk) 19:15, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
- Strong keep. Bad-faith nomination, you didn't notify the creator (me) of this, and WP:PORNBIO is still a guideline. Erpert 06:07, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete All sources are non-notable porn websites (attempts by the porn industry to give itself publicity). AVN award is a promotional award by porn industry. WP:PORNBIO is too lax and it's under discussion in Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(people)#PORNBIO:_yes_or_no.3F_.28maybe.29. (same as Janet Mason's AfD, which has similar problems) --Enric Naval (talk) 08:44, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- XBIZ is a non-notable website? Since when? By the way, I find it highly interesting that you are !voting "delete" in the exact same way in the same articles that Hipocrite is bringing to AfD. Erpert 09:19, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- You notified the world about this afd on WP:ANI. Shocker, then, that people are going to show up. Hipocrite (talk) 10:25, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- Enric put in his vote before I did that. Erpert 16:27, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- Falsehood. 06:36, 26 April 2012. Hipocrite (talk) 18:17, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- So I made a mistake. At least I'm still acting in good faith instead of bringing articles to AfD just because I have a dispute with the creator. Erpert 06:41, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- Falsehood. 06:36, 26 April 2012. Hipocrite (talk) 18:17, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- Enric put in his vote before I did that. Erpert 16:27, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- You notified the world about this afd on WP:ANI. Shocker, then, that people are going to show up. Hipocrite (talk) 10:25, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per Hipocrite/nom and Enric Naval. --Sonicyouth86 (talk) 15:37, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- keep 3 AVN nominations is sufficient notability. Yes industry awards, but so are oscars, grammys, tonys, etc. Gaijin42 (talk) 15:54, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - Delete votes have flawed understanding of what makes an award notable. AVN is only part of and promotes the industry in the sense that they report on the industry as a trade journal and as porn critics. Besides the nominations passes the current version of PORNBIO and also under the proposed tightened version PORNBIO that is currently being discussed on Misplaced Pages talk:Notability (people). Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:15, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete, no independent coverage outside the narrow sphere of the industry's self-promotion machinery, for which the author evidently wishes to create an outpost on Misplaced Pages. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:59, 28 April 2012 (UTC)