Misplaced Pages

Template:Article Rescue Squadron Code of Conduct: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:43, 19 March 2012 editGiraffedata (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers98,870 edits copy edit← Previous edit Revision as of 11:45, 1 May 2012 edit undoNorthamerica1000 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators708,032 edits added new graphicNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
| |
<center>'''<big>ARS Code of conduct</big>'''</center> <center>'''<big>ARS Code of conduct</big>'''</center>
] ]
* Please note that WikiProject ''']''' is a ] intended to improve the encyclopedia. The project is not about casting ], nor about vote-stacking. * Please note that WikiProject ''']''' is a ] intended to improve the encyclopedia. The project is not about casting ], nor about vote-stacking.
* '''Focus on ] content.''' For example, when working on an article listed for rescue, try to qualify topic ] by adding ] ] with significant coverage of the topic. Edit the content to address specific concerns raised in the AfD discussion. * '''Focus on ] content.''' For example, when working on an article listed for rescue, try to qualify topic ] by adding ] ] with significant coverage of the topic. Edit the content to address specific concerns raised in the AfD discussion.

Revision as of 11:45, 1 May 2012

ARS Code of conduct
  • Please note that WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron is a Wikiproject intended to improve the encyclopedia. The project is not about casting !votes, nor about vote-stacking.
  • Focus on improving content. For example, when working on an article listed for rescue, try to qualify topic notability by adding reliable-source references with significant coverage of the topic. Edit the content to address specific concerns raised in the AfD discussion.
  • Show the light. If you comment in an AfD discussion, try to describe points in the nomination that have been corrected. Note any remaining deficiencies (e.g. lack of organization, structural problems, lack of balance, etc.). Base comments upon Misplaced Pages's deletion policy. If an article has been rewritten, you may place a comment in the AfD as a courtesy to assist the closing admin in determining which article version others were referring to.

See also

Category: