Revision as of 19:33, 1 May 2012 editKahastok (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,818 edits →Removing the quotes: not just the quotes that are the problem← Previous edit |
Revision as of 19:34, 1 May 2012 edit undoKahastok (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,818 editsm →Removing the quotes: betterNext edit → |
Line 6: |
Line 6: |
|
Unless I recive some solid objections I'm going to remove the quotes since at the moment they seem pretty slanted.] (]) 18:50, 1 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
Unless I recive some solid objections I'm going to remove the quotes since at the moment they seem pretty slanted.] (]) 18:50, 1 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:I suppose you haven't read the prose? I wouldn't blame you, it's a bit dense. Suffice it to say that it ranks roughly alongside Labour party election campaign literature in terms of editorial bias. '']'' <small>'']''</small> 19:33, 1 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
:I suppose you haven't read the prose? I wouldn't blame you, it's a bit dense. Suffice it to say that this article ranks roughly alongside Labour party election campaign literature in terms of editorial bias. '']'' <small>'']''</small> 19:33, 1 May 2012 (UTC) |
Unless I recive some solid objections I'm going to remove the quotes since at the moment they seem pretty slanted.Genisock2 (talk) 18:50, 1 May 2012 (UTC)