Misplaced Pages

User talk:Wtshymanski: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:19, 2 May 2012 editWtshymanski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users76,137 edits Not even remotely fair.: But what is...what is?← Previous edit Revision as of 15:37, 2 May 2012 edit undoAndy Dingley (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers160,457 edits NACA reports: new sectionNext edit →
Line 13: Line 13:
==MfD nomination of ]== ==MfD nomination of ]==
], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 11:09, 2 May 2012 (UTC) ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 11:09, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

== NACA reports ==

]

This should be discussed centrally, once and for all. ] (]) 15:37, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:37, 2 May 2012

This page has been blanked. --Wtshymanski (talk) 19:29, 10 February 2012 (UTC) ..again.

Not even remotely fair.

Your listing of a simple typo that was quickly corrected as if it was a major error (see https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User%3AWtshymanski%2FGriping&diff=490185155&oldid=489153153 is unfair and offensive. Have you never hit the 9 key when you meant to hit the 0 key? I am asking you nicely to please remove the entry. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:37, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Why? It's on the record and it's amusing. It also serves as a reminded that we look foolish in arguments. Hardly offensive if it's true. --Wtshymanski (talk) 21:42, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
I don't mind looking foolish when I have actually been foolish. This was just a slip of the finger. It is not true that a simple typo belongs on your list of boneheaded statements. It should be reserved for people who actually believe the misconceptions you imply that they believe. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:55, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
It's been a while and I haven't looked back into this particular teapot, but I think the reason it made the list was the *insistence* that a chip had 49 pins instead of 40. It was more than a one-shot typo. Plus when you're being swarmed in the schoolyard sometimes pointing out a bully's untied shoelace is all you've got. --Wtshymanski (talk) 13:19, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Wtshymanski/Griping

User:Wtshymanski/Griping, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wtshymanski/Griping and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Wtshymanski/Griping during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Elen of the Roads (talk) 11:09, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

NACA reports

Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_May_2#Category:National_Advisory_Committee_for_Aeronautics

This should be discussed centrally, once and for all. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:37, 2 May 2012 (UTC)