| Revision as of 16:14, 21 May 2012 editNick Cooper (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,258 edits Undid revision 493669589 by 89.100.207.51 (talk)← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:17, 21 May 2012 edit undo89.100.207.51 (talk) Disagreeing with you is still not vandalism. Please read WP:NOTVAND, and please stop leaving fake warnings on my page.Next edit → | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
| Hi. Please be careful not to get caught up in an edit war about Chaplin. (It's always difficult to know if we are talking to the same person on an IP address, but if you have not already done so, please read ]). As far as Chaplin is concerned you are wishing to remove content which has been accepted for some time (possibly grudgingly) and has a reference (even if possibly not good enough). It would be fine to remove it, with a good explanation such as you have provided in your most recent edit summary, if nobody objects (see ]) but since that is not the case it is probably better to open a talk page section about it. --] (]) 15:38, 16 May 2012 (UTC) | Hi. Please be careful not to get caught up in an edit war about Chaplin. (It's always difficult to know if we are talking to the same person on an IP address, but if you have not already done so, please read ]). As far as Chaplin is concerned you are wishing to remove content which has been accepted for some time (possibly grudgingly) and has a reference (even if possibly not good enough). It would be fine to remove it, with a good explanation such as you have provided in your most recent edit summary, if nobody objects (see ]) but since that is not the case it is probably better to open a talk page section about it. --] (]) 15:38, 16 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == May 2012 == | |||
| ] Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of ], such as the one you made to ], did not appear to be constructive and has been ] or removed. Please use ] for any test edits you would like to make, and read the ] to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --> ] (]) 07:47, 17 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> | |||
| Please be particularly aware, ] states: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts. | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> — ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">· ]]</span> 20:58, 18 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ] Please stop your ]. If you continue to ] Misplaced Pages, as you did at ], you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning3 --> ] (]) 11:58, 19 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ] This is your '''only warning'''; if you ] Misplaced Pages again, as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning4 --> ] (]) 15:00, 21 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
Revision as of 16:17, 21 May 2012
 Welcome!Last edited:Last edited by:16:17, 21 May 2012 (UTC) 89.100.207.51 (talk · contribs) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Misplaced Pages? Create an account! Your IP address, To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.  Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
April 2012
Your recent editing history at Katana shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You need to discuss this or invite some outside opinions (maybe start an RfC). You can't just keep on reverting eathother and calling eachother names like "vandal" or "troll". DanielRigal (talk) 12:41, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
Nyttend (talk) 13:35, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Lily Allen
She lived and went to school in Leixlip. http://www.stevecummins.com/interviews/lily-allen-whats-up-tiger-lily:
"He lives in Dunboyne, but I lived in Leixlip for about a year and a half,” she explains. “My mom was doing a film in Ireland called Hear My Song. I was really young, like six or seven at the time. Weirdly enough, he was in the same school as me in Leixlip, but we didn’t meet again until something like eight or nine years later, which was a mad coincidence.”
Hope this clears it up for you. Murry1975 (talk) 16:51, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Fair enough, I assumed it was vandalism. 89.100.207.51 (talk) 17:21, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Leixlip shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Murry1975 (talk) 13:43, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
ANI report
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wesley☀Mouse 21:46, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
A cup of tea for you!
|
Following the minor misunderstandings at ANI and here, I feel that a lot of things may have been learnt from the outcome. Therefore, I would like to send this WikiLove Cup of Tea, as a sign of peace between us all. Wesley☀Mouse 23:46, 25 April 2012 (UTC) |
- If I weren't such an impudent shit, I'd throw in a cookie--but I ate them all. Best, Drmies (talk) 00:02, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- It's okay, I forgive you, Drmies. 89.100.207.51 (talk) 02:21, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Jessica Chastain
Hi. Please be careful not to get caught up in an edit war about Chaplin. (It's always difficult to know if we are talking to the same person on an IP address, but if you have not already done so, please read WP:3RR). As far as Chaplin is concerned you are wishing to remove content which has been accepted for some time (possibly grudgingly) and has a reference (even if possibly not good enough). It would be fine to remove it, with a good explanation such as you have provided in your most recent edit summary, if nobody objects (see WP:BOLD) but since that is not the case it is probably better to open a talk page section about it. --Mirokado (talk) 15:38, 16 May 2012 (UTC)