| Revision as of 03:36, 22 April 2006 editCrakorjack (talk | contribs)23 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:46, 22 April 2006 edit undoCoren (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,492 edits →[]: speedy deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| Should be reviewed for deletion, the previous deletion in 2005 was in my opinion uinfair. I, the author, am posting this page as AfD to avoid it being speedy deleted because it is a repost of an already deleted article. However i believe the original article was unfairly deleted and this should be given a second chance. It is valid information which is not false and should be given a second review perhaps.] 03:31, 22 April 2006 (UTC) | Should be reviewed for deletion, the previous deletion in 2005 was in my opinion uinfair. I, the author, am posting this page as AfD to avoid it being speedy deleted because it is a repost of an already deleted article. However i believe the original article was unfairly deleted and this should be given a second chance. It is valid information which is not false and should be given a second review perhaps.] 03:31, 22 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy delete''' Even if the page wasn't drivel, it would be ]. Original deletion was justified. ] 03:46, 22 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:46, 22 April 2006
Where da moviez at
Should be reviewed for deletion, the previous deletion in 2005 was in my opinion uinfair. I, the author, am posting this page as AfD to avoid it being speedy deleted because it is a repost of an already deleted article. However i believe the original article was unfairly deleted and this should be given a second chance. It is valid information which is not false and should be given a second review perhaps.Crakorjack 03:31, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Even if the page wasn't drivel, it would be WP:NOR. Original deletion was justified. Coren 03:46, 22 April 2006 (UTC)