Revision as of 05:40, 29 April 2012 editKkm010 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,117 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:06, 13 June 2012 edit undoKumioko (talk | contribs)76,062 edits Merge and assess WikiProject United States Supported banners and cleanup using AWB (8062)Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
{{Talk header}} | ||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | {{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | ||
{{WikiProject Luxembourg |
{{WikiProject Luxembourg| class = Start | importance = High }} | ||
{{WikiProject India|class=Start|importance=mid}} |
{{WikiProject India|class=Start|importance=mid}} | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Mining}} | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Companies|class=|importance=}} | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Business|class=stub|importance=High}} | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject United States|class=Stub|importance=low}} | ||
}} |
}} | ||
] should not be merged into the article ] for the following reasons: | ] should not be merged into the article ] for the following reasons: | ||
==Untitled== | |||
1. ] has not been merged into ArcelorMittal's article. | 1. ] has not been merged into ArcelorMittal's article. | ||
2. ] was a past entity, and it's accomplishments cannot be combined with those of ArcelorMittal's | 2. ] was a past entity, and it's accomplishments cannot be combined with those of ArcelorMittal's | ||
3. MittalSteel had a different set of directors and executives than ArcelorMittal | 3. MittalSteel had a different set of directors and executives than ArcelorMittal | ||
] (]) 22:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC) | ] (]) 22:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
I have the same view i.e that Mittal Steel should not be merged into Arcelor Mittal as technically , legally and culturally they are different companies. Even if mittal steel does not exist anymore it does provide a useful antitheses for students and knowledge mongers alike to know what the older company was all about . | I have the same view i.e that Mittal Steel should not be merged into Arcelor Mittal as technically , legally and culturally they are different companies. Even if mittal steel does not exist anymore it does provide a useful antitheses for students and knowledge mongers alike to know what the older company was all about . | ||
== clarification of place == | == clarification of place == | ||
⚫ | "Its industrial presence in Europe, Asia, Africa and America" - which 'America'? The US of America? 'The Americas'? North America? | ||
⚫ | The first three are continents, so I assume that 'America' is meant to be as well, but you need to specifies which continent or else pluralize it to read 'the Americas'. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 16:44, 2 September 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
⚫ | "Its industrial presence in Europe, Asia, Africa and America" - which 'America'? The US of America? 'The Americas'? North America? |
||
⚫ | The first three are continents, so I assume that 'America' is meant to be as well, but you need to specifies which continent or else pluralize it to read 'the Americas'. |
||
==Pollution from Arcelor Mittal steel plants== | ==Pollution from Arcelor Mittal steel plants== | ||
"Shouldnt there be a section on the pollution caused by the steel plants owned and operated by Arcelor Mittal, the various action groups and the steps taken by the steel company to rectify the situation? There was a documentary on ITV1, UK yesterday, 03/Oct/2011. |
"Shouldnt there be a section on the pollution caused by the steel plants owned and operated by Arcelor Mittal, the various action groups and the steps taken by the steel company to rectify the situation? There was a documentary on ITV1, UK yesterday, 03/Oct/2011. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 09:32, 4 October 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
I also think, there should be link to the related video implemented to the area "Critism" : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDbDCf4OWfg |
I also think, there should be link to the related video implemented to the area "Critism" : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDbDCf4OWfg <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 08:03, 25 October 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 09:06, 13 June 2012
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ArcelorMittal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Mittal Steel should not be merged into the article ArcelorMittal for the following reasons:
Untitled
1. Arcelor has not been merged into ArcelorMittal's article. 2. MittalSteel was a past entity, and it's accomplishments cannot be combined with those of ArcelorMittal's 3. MittalSteel had a different set of directors and executives than ArcelorMittal EVil-Aer (talk) 22:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
I have the same view i.e that Mittal Steel should not be merged into Arcelor Mittal as technically , legally and culturally they are different companies. Even if mittal steel does not exist anymore it does provide a useful antitheses for students and knowledge mongers alike to know what the older company was all about .
clarification of place
"Its industrial presence in Europe, Asia, Africa and America" - which 'America'? The US of America? 'The Americas'? North America?
The first three are continents, so I assume that 'America' is meant to be as well, but you need to specifies which continent or else pluralize it to read 'the Americas'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.15.65.36 (talk) 16:44, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Pollution from Arcelor Mittal steel plants
"Shouldnt there be a section on the pollution caused by the steel plants owned and operated by Arcelor Mittal, the various action groups and the steps taken by the steel company to rectify the situation? There was a documentary on ITV1, UK yesterday, 03/Oct/2011. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stillspringwater (talk • contribs) 09:32, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
I also think, there should be link to the related video implemented to the area "Critism" : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDbDCf4OWfg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.179.215.98 (talk) 08:03, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Categories:- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class Luxembourg articles
- High-importance Luxembourg articles
- WikiProject Luxembourg articles
- Start-Class India articles
- Mid-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- Unassessed Mining articles
- Unknown-importance Mining articles
- WikiProject Mining articles
- Unassessed company articles
- Unknown-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class WikiProject Business articles
- High-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles