Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:43, 18 June 2012

• WP:UND
• WP:REFUND
• WP:UNDELETE

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review, rather than here.

To contest deletions that have have already been discussed (in particular, at Articles for deletion), or that are likely to be controversial, please make a request at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review instead.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280 281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 350 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360 361, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380 381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 390 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400 401, 402, 403, 404, 405

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Six Figure Adsense Code

• Six Figure Adsense Code · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·

First I believe this could help people create income for themselves, this course works and has already been prove to work comment are coming in very day about income being improved.

If I did follow the guide line it was because I never seen the ones that were shown to me now. How might I improve upon this to meet the the guide lines. In what way do I need to present it to make it fit -Don Minor (talk) 22:50, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

• The article was promotional in nature, and you are admitting as much.  Not done - Mike Rosoft (talk) 07:00, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

ted gambordella

• Ted Gambordella · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) ·

reasoning -76.187.57.111 (talk) 14:36, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

One of the reasons this page was deleted as that no one seemed to be able to find any books I have actually written. Please, I know it might not be appropriate for the actual author to reply, but since no one else seems to have even done a search on Amazon.com to see a listing of all my books, I thought I would simply ask that someone at WIKI or a 'reader' just go to Amazon.com, and search my name. I have written 42 books, over 34 DVD's and they are really in print, online and in many books stores. I do not understand why people are allowed to remove my page...after saying they couldn't find any of my books. Just type my name Gambordella on Gooogle, go do Amazon, and you will see them. Is that really so hard? Ted Gambordella

• Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ted Gambordella, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. GB fan 15:26, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

JFA article should be restored

• JFA (band) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) ·

Misplaced Pages rules notwithstanding, removing an entire article about a notable topic merely due to lack of "independent sources" being cited seems unreasonable. JFA was and is well-known and influential in the punk genre, and I think the deletion of the page is unjustified. -75.162.14.123 (talk) 01:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:32, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Nikesh Thapaliya

• Nikesh Thapaliya · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) ·

I don't think this page needs to be deleted. Nikesh is not just a multiple world records holder. If he was only a world record holder, I am sure he wouldn't be qualified to be in Misplaced Pages. He is also a writer, journalist, activist and has achieved quite a lot at his young age. So, his biography doesn't need to be deleted from Misplaced Pages. Thank you. -Ath.Sn (talk) 04:55, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. & Please note that removal of deletion templates can lead to your being blocked from editing. Skier Dude (talk) 05:15, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Nikesh Thapaliya

• Nikesh Thapaliya · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) ·

This biography is not just about what world records he has made. In fact, records are only a part off his biography. He has been writer, freelance writer, journalist, activist, UN Volunteer. There are still many pages in Misplaced Pages which simply exist due to the person's single win in any beauty pageant and even playing role in any one film has automatically given someone a place in Misplaced Pages. But yes, this article may be improved but not deleted. Thanks! -202.52.235.145 (talk) 05:08, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. & note that the contributions of 113.199.144.131 and 202.52.235.145 & Special:Contributions/SamKns & Special:Contributions/Ath.Sn starts looking a lot like the misuse of multiple accounts Skier Dude (talk) 05:23, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Nikesh Thapaliya

• Nikesh Thapaliya · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) ·

*This biography can be improved but not necessarily be deleted! There are still many pages in Misplaced Pages which exist here simply because a person has won one beauty pageant and also if someone has played role in one film. This biography is here not because the person is just simply a world record holder. -202.52.235.145 (talk) 05:34, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:04, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Nikesh Thapaliya

• Nikesh Thapaliya · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) ·

Let's not delete this article entirely but it can be improved. I don't think the person has been mentioned in this biography is here because of having those records but like as written in the bio and sources mentioned, he has also been writer, journalist, activist. There are still many poorly written articles on Misplaced Pages which have been there due to some overnight transformation of an individual. We need to look on that too. Let's not make this one article a subject matter of controversy. User:Gsdan012 -Gsdan012 (talk) 05:50, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Please note that removal of deletion templates can lead to your being blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:02, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Nikesh Thapaliya

• Nikesh Thapaliya · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) ·

Additionally, simply talking about the world records of this person also, these are really worth noting. The mention of these world records here is like mentioning the wins of an athlete and films of an actor. But again, it doesn't seem that the person is here in this biography just for the world records but his other contribution too. Here it seems world records of him are good to be mentioned but not the main part of the article. Misplaced Pages has no article of any individual just for being solely a world record holder. -Gsdan012 (talk) 06:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Please note that removal of deletion templates can lead to your being blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:02, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Subway restaurant.svg

• File:Subway.svg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · (local copy of File:Subway restaurant.svg)

To one user, the arrows from S and Y would make them copyrightable. If that's the case, then how is the current logo ineligible for copyrights? -George Ho (talk) 10:35, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

I think you have the wrong file. Popups show me an icon for a subway station, not the Subway logo. —Jeremy v^_^v 19:20, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

As confirmed, Subway logo is ineligible for copyrights; there must be older revisions. If so, then they must be temporarily undeleted for me to copy-and-paste older, larger revisions. --George Ho (talk) 16:28, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

• Almost forgot: deletion nom in Commons was withdrawn. --George Ho (talk) 03:24, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

• This is a bit messy for restoration as the image is used in many station articles. I have emailed you the image. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:40, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

• I'm sorry, but I don't know how I must make SVG files viewable, especially on my desktop. How can I paste some programming thing into Commons? --George Ho (talk) 04:55, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

• Done emailed as an attachment. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:35, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Nikesh Thapaliya

• Nikesh Thapaliya · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) ·

The page has been improved with lots of changes. The person has been mentioned as writer/journalist/activist. His world records have been only included as secondary parts and 'other works'. -Ath.Sn (talk) 06:22, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

• Not done - this page has not yet been deleted.. See the AFD for more information (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:34, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

boston kelly

• Boston kelly · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·

can you tell me why it was deleted? how do I go about updating the Fessenden family line? -Fessbiographer (talk) 17:25, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Misplaced Pages considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Most members of the Fessenden family will be as non-notable as "Boston" Kelly, and have no place in an encyclopedia. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:07, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Oxford Centre for Ecclesiology and Practical Theology

• PageName · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·

reasoning -Wahine99 (talk) 08:21, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

This is a genuine research centre at Ripoon College Cuddesdon, an Anglican theologiical college linked to the University of Oxford. I have twice tried to upload a page on OxCEPT and it has been deleted. My name is Dr Cathy Ross, a tutor at Ripon College Cuddesdon and Director of OxCEPT. All my contact details are below if you need to contact me. I have put up the page to create awareness of the Centre so that people can know what we are researching and get involved. The latest deletion claimed that it was imporper advertising - I do not see this as advertising but as information about our Centre and research interests.

Dr Cathy Ross MTh Coordinator, Tutor in Contextual Theology Director of OxCEPT Ripon College, Cuddesdon OX44 9EX tel: +44 1865 874404 fax: + 44 1865 875431 Direct dial: + 44 1865 877420

Not done but you are welcome to write a non promotional page suitable for an encyclopedia. The deleted one looked like a press release. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:49, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Manoj K. Varghese

• Manoj K. Varghese · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·

The upload is not intended to advertise and will give authentic references on the article too. -Manukariyad (talk) 12:09, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Not done The deleted article was promotional in tone and without references.So you best start from scratch based on the authentic third party sources you have in mind. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:09, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

SOTO&TORRES

• SOTO&TORRES · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·

I want it moved to my user sandbox so I can revise it and ask help of other admins on improving it before uploading it again. I do want to make the article more viable for wikipedia users. Will change overall tone -Sentimentalstyle (talk) 23:52, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

• Done Userfied at User:Sentimentalstyle/Soto &Torres Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:42, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Kameelion (musician)

• Kameelion (musician) · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) ·

If it can be restored, there can be a major clean up and he now has released his debut album which got into the Independent UK charts.

Please restore so it can be rectified. -CrackersTeam (talk) 13:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Kameelion, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Davewild (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Skier Dude (talk) 04:20, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Alternative subway logo.svg

• File:Alternative subway logo.svg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·

This image is now ineligible for copyrights. I wonder if you have older revisions with high resolution. -George Ho (talk) 16:18, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Done restored, but being an svg the size makes no difference to resolution. If you click the 2000px you will get this lafger version: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/3a/Alternative_subway_logo.svg/2000px-Alternative_subway_logo.svg.png and even a 4000px version can be pulled out from wikimedia: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/3a/Alternative_subway_logo.svg/4000px-Alternative_subway_logo.svg.png. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:12, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Ha, putting in that link makes google images think that there is a 4000 pixel wide logo! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:33, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

FLYHT Aerospace Solutions Ltd.

• FLYHT Aerospace Solutions Ltd. · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·

I am not sure what the content was, but if the article was 5 years old, as the contester noted on the talk page (see Talk:FLYHT Aerospace Solutions Ltd.) then maybe the article should have been tagged for improvement. -Svgalbertian (talk) 22:05, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

• Done the article was not too promotional and could be improved, only a bit over 3 years old though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:42, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Athletics at the 2008 Commonwealth Youth Games

• Athletics at the 2008 Commonwealth Youth Games · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) ·

It appears that User:Intoronto1125 moved this article to his userspace then requested that the page be deleted because it was in his own userspace. I can't remember if the original article was in a useful format or not, though at the time of deletion the user was on a bit of a self-destructive streak. If there is useful information, could this be restored so I can work on it? -SFB 11:55, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

• It was merely the results (times, heights, distances), with wikilinked names to people who will likely never have articles (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:16, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
  • I disagree. Two of the winners (Kirani James and Caster Semenya) are world champions and we have a fair number of articles on other athletes already (Mercy Cherono, Cornel Fredericks, Sophie Hitchon etc) as many have competed at world championship-level. SFB 14:47, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
    • DoneWell I put it at Athletics at the 2008 Commonwealth Youth Games/boys medals so that Sillyfolkboy can use the content. If you do not want to use the content retag with sd-G6, otherwise attribution may be required if you use the content. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:25, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

List of potential candidates for the Nobel Prize in Literature

• List of potential candidates for the Nobel Prize in Literature · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·

article was deleted disregarding Misplaced Pages policies -Anthrophilos (talk) 00:49, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

It's a WP:BLP violation. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:06, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

It might not be against policy to restore to your user space. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 01:10, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Article does not contain any original research (NOR) and all information can be verified by establishing reliable sources (V). Burden of evidence is on my side. The article is a new project and sources will be added. BLP does not apply as this is a list, not a biographical article. If you delete an article next time, please abide by Misplaced Pages's deletion policies and leave time for a user to challenge a proposed deletion. Thanks. --Anthrophilos (talk) 01:18, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Arthur Rubin - can you please expand on why it is a BLP violation? If it is really a problem then it should not be here, but I don't think that is the problem with the list. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:32, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

It seems that I am not the only one who is having issues with him. Arthur Rubin is frequently involved in edit wars and misuses his admin rights. Further information here on Youtube: Arthur Rubin, Abusive Admin on Misplaced Pages. Contact Misplaced Pages Directly --Anthrophilos (talk) 17:43, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Aeon1006/stats

• User:Aeon1006/stats · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) ·

Deleted via prod. Concern: Useless user subpage. -Captaincollect1970 (talk) 00:57, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

• Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I am surprised that prod would have applied to this even in 2008! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:29, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Web fraud detection

• Web fraud detection · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) ·

PROD reason was Advertisement for hybridsec.com. Undelete = any advert content can/will be removed and notable topic should not be deleted -Widefox (talk) 10:37, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

I suggest that you write this again. It reads like the introduction to a promotion by a company, building up a scare story and legislative requirement. It does not cover the topic at all Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:45, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

hmmm, rethink...with respect, I just wanted to fix a redlink to it, my feedback is that PROD undelete should be quicker than AfD/CSD where I'm used to getting a look myself via userfy. Widefox (talk) 14:03, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages deletion
• Misplaced Pages maintenance