Misplaced Pages

User talk:Roux: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:38, 29 June 2012 view sourceClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,379,535 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Roux/Archives/2012/June. (BOT)← Previous edit Revision as of 07:10, 6 July 2012 view source Urselius (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers24,674 edits →Which/that: new sectionNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:


{{User talk:Roux/t}} {{User talk:Roux/t}}

== Which/that ==

I am pleased that you reverted from 'that' to 'which' on the Battle of Waterloo article. The spurious convention, often slavishly applied in the USA, insisting that 'which' is only used in conjuction with a comma is stifling good expression in English. I particularly despise journal editors/proofreaders who change my use of 'which' to 'that'. ] (]) 07:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:10, 6 July 2012


roux

main • talk • dashboard • sandbox • edits • email • refresh
archiving performed by cluebot every five days // online


talk archives
2008 / apr-aug / a / s / o / n / d
2009 / j / f / m / a / m / j / j / a / s / o / n / d
2010 / j / f / m / a / m / j / j / a / s / o / n / d
2011 / j / f / m / a / m / j / j / a / s / o / n / d
2012 / j / f / m / a / m / j / j / a / s / o / n / d

Which/that

I am pleased that you reverted from 'that' to 'which' on the Battle of Waterloo article. The spurious convention, often slavishly applied in the USA, insisting that 'which' is only used in conjuction with a comma is stifling good expression in English. I particularly despise journal editors/proofreaders who change my use of 'which' to 'that'. Urselius (talk) 07:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)