Misplaced Pages

Little Russia: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:17, 15 July 2012 editAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,572,520 editsm Dating maintenance tags: {{Fact}}← Previous edit Revision as of 17:31, 15 July 2012 edit undoHillock65 (talk | contribs)4,431 edits Modern context: less inflamatory termNext edit →
Line 38: Line 38:


==Modern context== ==Modern context==
Although originally "Little Russia" (Rus' Minor) was merely a geographic, linguistic and ethnological term, it is now archaic and its usage in the modern context to refer to the country of Ukraine and the modern Ukrainian nation, its language, culture, etc., is considered an improper anachronism. Such usage is typically perceived as an imperial view that the Ukrainian territory and people ("Little Russians") belong to "one, indivisible Russia."<ref>Analysis of the events of the Orange Revolution in Ukraine by Prof. Y. Petrovsky-Shtern May 23, 2007</ref> Regardless of whether they are aware or not of its origin, today many Ukrainian ]s consider the term to be disparaging, indicative of an "older brother" attitude,{{Citation needed|date=May 2007}} and of imperial Russian (and Soviet) suppression of the Ukrainian national idea. In particular, it has continued to be used in Russian national discourse, where modern Ukrainians is presented as a single people in united ].<ref name=Smolin>{{ru icon}} Mikhail Smolin, "" (Overcoming the "Ukrainianness" and the all-Russian unity), «Вестник Юго-Западной Руси», №1, 2006 г.</ref> This added new hostility and disapproval of the term by some Ukrainians.<ref name=UkrainiansEnc/> Although originally "Little Russia" (Rus' Minor) was merely a geographic, linguistic and ethnological term, it is now archaic and its usage in the modern context to refer to the country of Ukraine and the modern Ukrainian nation, its language, culture, etc., is considered an improper anachronism. Such usage is typically perceived as an imperial view that the Ukrainian territory and people ("Little Russians") belong to "one, indivisible Russia."<ref>Analysis of the events of the Orange Revolution in Ukraine by Prof. Y. Petrovsky-Shtern May 23, 2007</ref> Regardless of whether they are aware or not of its origin, today many Ukrainian nationalists consider the term to be disparaging, indicative of an "older brother" attitude,{{Citation needed|date=May 2007}} and of imperial Russian (and Soviet) suppression of the Ukrainian national idea. In particular, it has continued to be used in Russian national discourse, where modern Ukrainians is presented as a single people in united ].<ref name=Smolin>{{ru icon}} Mikhail Smolin, "" (Overcoming the "Ukrainianness" and the all-Russian unity), «Вестник Юго-Западной Руси», №1, 2006 г.</ref> This added new hostility and disapproval of the term by some Ukrainians.<ref name=UkrainiansEnc/>


=="Little Russianness"== =="Little Russianness"==

Revision as of 17:31, 15 July 2012

A fragment of the “new and accurate map of Europe collected from the best authorities...” by Emanuel Bowen published in 1747 in his A complete system of geography. Left-bank Ukraine is shown as “Little Russia”. Great, White, and Red Russias are also seen, and the legend “Ukrain” straddles the Dnieper river near Poltava.

Little Russia (Rus' Minor), sometimes Little Rus’ (Template:Lang-ru or Малороссия; Template:Lang-ua), is a historical political and geographical term in the Russian language referring to most of the territory of modern-day Ukraine before the 20th century. Accordingly, derivatives such as "Little Russian" (Template:Lang-ru) were commonly applied to the people, language, and culture of the area. After the collapse of the Russian Empire, and with the amalgamation of Ukrainian territories into one administrative unit the word was phased out of circulation and when used took on a derogative connotation denoting those Ukrainians with little or no national consciousness. The term retains currency among Russian monarchists and nationalists who deny that Ukraine and Ukrainians are distinct from Russia and Russians. Because Ukraine and its people have undergone the process of nation-building over the last seven hundred years, Little Russia, even in the historic context, can only loosely be considered as merely a contemporary equivalent for the word Ukraine. The term has become an archaic one, and anachronistic usage in the modern context was considered strongly offensive by Ukrainian nationalists in the 1980s.

Etymology

Further information: Etymology of Rus and derivatives

The Russian ethnonym translates as Little or Lesser Rus’ and is adapted from the Greek term, used in medieval times by patriarchs of Constantinople since the 14th century (it first appeared in church documents in 1335). The Byzantines called the northern and southern part of the lands of Rus’ as: Μεγάλη Ῥωσσία (Megálē Rhōssía) — Greater Rus’) and Μικρὰ Ῥωσσία (Mikrà Rhōssía - Rus’ Minor, Lesser or Little Rus’), respectively. Little or Lesser means ‘near’ (analogously to Asia Minor, and Małopolska of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.

In the 17th century the term Malorossiya was introduced into Russian. In English the term is often translated Little Russia or Little Rus’, depending on the context.

Historical usage

Nikolay Sergeyev. "Apple blossom. In Little Russia." 1895. Oil on canvas.
This original German map titled "Europäisches Russland" (European Russia) published in 1895-1990 by Meyers Konversationslexikon uses the terms Klein-Russland and Gross-Russland which literally means Little Russia and Great Russia, respectively.
"In Little Russia". Photo by Sergey Prokudin-Gorsky, between 1905 and 1915.

The first recorded usage of the term is attributed to Boleslaus George II of Halych. He styled himself «dux totius Rusiæ Minoris» in a letter to Dietrich von Altenburg, the Grand Master of the Teutonic Knights in 1335. The name was used by Patriarch Callistus I of Constantinople in 1361 when he created two metropolitan sees: the one called Great Rus’ in Vladimir and Kiev and the other one called Little Rus’ with the centers in Galich (Halych) and Novgorodok (Navahrudak). The king Casimir III of Poland, was called "the king of Lechia and Little Rus’". According to Mykhaylo Hrushevsky Little Rus’ was the Halych-Volhynian Principality, and after its downfall, the name ceased to be used.

In the post-medieval period, the name of Little Rus’ is known to first be used by Eastern Orthodox clergy of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, for example by influential cleric and writer Ioan Vyshensky (1600, 1608), Metropolitan Matthew of Kiev and All Rus’ (1606), Bishop Ioann (Biretskoy) of Peremyshl, Metropolitan Isaiah (Kopinsky) of Kiev, Archimandrite Zacharius Kopystensky of Kiev Pechersk Lavra, etc. The term has been applied to all Orthodox Ruthenian lands of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Vyshensky addressed to "the Christians of Little Russia, brotherhoods of Lvov and Vilna" and Kopystensky wrote "Little Russia, or Kiev and Lithuania".

The term was adopted in 17th century by Tsardom of Russia to refer to the Cossack Hetmanate of Left-bank Ukraine, when the latter fell under Russian protection after the Treaty of Pereyaslav (1654). From 1654 to 1721, the official title of Russian Tsars, gained the wording (literal translation): "The Sovereign of all Rus’: the Great, the Little, and the White."

The term Little Rus’ has been used in letters of the Cossack Hetmans Bohdan Khmelnytsky and Ivan Sirko. The Archimandrite of the Kiev-Pechersk Lavra Innokentiy Gizel wrote that the Russian people is a unity of three branches: Great Russia, Little Russia and White Russia under the only legal authority of the Moscow Tsars. The term Little Russia has been used in Ukrainian chronicle by Samiylo Velychko, in a chronicle of the Hieromonk Leontiy (Bobolinski), in "Thesaurus" by Archimandrite Ioannikiy (Golyatovsky).

The usage of the name was later broadened to apply loosely to the parts of the Right-bank Ukraine when it was annexed by Russia in the end of the 18th century upon the partitions of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. In the 18th and 19th centuries Russian Imperial administrative units the Little Russian Governorate and eponymous General Governorship were formed and existed for several decades before being split and renamed in subsequent administrative reforms.

Up until the very end of the 19th century Little Russia was a prevailing designation for much of the modern territory of Ukraine controlled by the Russian Empire as well as for its people and their language as can be seen from its usage in numerous scholarly, literary and artistic works. For instance, "Little Russia" has been preferred by the famous Ukrainian poet Taras Shevchenko in his private diary (1857—1858). Ukrainophile historians Mykhaylo Maksymovych, Nikolay Kostomarov, Dmytro Bahaliy, Volodymyr Antonovych acknowledged the fact that during Russo-Polish wars "Ukraine" had only a geographical meaning of borderlands of both states but "Little Russia" was an ethnic name of Little (Southern) Russian people. In his prominent work "Two Russian nationalities" Kostomarov uses Southern Russia and Little Russia interchangeably. Mykhailo Drahomanov titled his first fundamental historic work "Little Russia in its literature" (1867–1870). Different prominent artists (e.g. Mykola Pymonenko, Konstiantyn Trutovsky, Nikolay Sergeyev, photographer Sergey Prokudin-Gorsky, etc.), many of whom were natives from the territory of modern-day Ukraine, used "Little Russia" in titles of their paintings of Ukrainian landscapes.

The term "Little Russian language" was used by the state authorities in the first Russian Empire Census conducted as late as in 1897.

From Little Russia to Ukraine

Further information: Name of Ukraine
Part of a series on the
History of Ukraine
Topics
Early history
Middle Ages
Early Modern period
Modern history
Contemporary Ukraine
Part of a series on the
History of Russia
PeriodsPrehistory  • Antiquity  • Early Slavs
Rus' people pre-9th century
    Rus' Khaganate
    Arthania
    Garðaríki

879–1240: Ancient Rus'
Novgorod Land 882–1136
Principality of Polotsk 987–1397
Principality of Chernigov 988–1402
Rostov-Suzdal 1093–1157
    full list...

1240–1480: Feudal Rus'
Novgorod Republic 1136–1478
Vladimir-Suzdal 1157–1331
Principality of Moscow 1263–1547
    full list...

1480–1917: Tsarist Russia
Tsardom of Russia 1547–1721
Russian Empire 1721–1917
     Russian America 1799–1867
     Grand Duchy of Finland 1809–1917
     Congress Poland 1867–1915
     Russian Manchuria 1900–1905
     Uryankhay Krai 1914–1921

1917–1923: Russian Revolution
Russian Republic 1917–1918
     General Secretariat of Ukraine 1917–1918
Russian SFSR 1917–1922
     Ukrainian SSR 1919–1922
     Byelorussian SSR 1920–1922
     Transcaucasian SFSR 1922–1922
Russian State 1918–1920
     Provisional Priamurye Govt. 1921–1923
    full list...

1923–1991: Soviet Era
Soviet Union 1922–1991
     Russian SFSR 1922–1991
     Karelo-Finnish SSR1940–1956
        full list...
Tannu Tuva1921–1944

since 1991: Modern Russia
Russian Federation 1991–present
     Republic of Tatarstan 1994–present
     Chechen Republic 2000–present
     Republic of Crimea 2014–present
     Donetsk People's Republic 2022–present
     Luhansk People's Republic 2022–present
     Kherson Oblast 2022–present
     Zaporizhzhia Oblast 2022–present
        full list... ^A Not internationally recognized.
^B Not fully controlled.
Timeline860–17211721–17961796–1855
1855–18941894–19171917–1927
1927–19531953–19641964–1982
1982–19911991–present
flag Russia portal

The term Little Russia (that traces its origin to the medieval times) used to be widely used as the name for the geographic territory. Since the middle of the 17th century the modern name "Ukraine" (Ukrayina) (first found in the 12th century chronicles) was used sporadically, until it was reintroduced in the 19th century by a conscious effort of several writers concerned about the awakening of the Ukrainian national awareness. It was not until the 20th century when the modern term "Ukraine" started to prevail while Little Russia gradually fell out of use.

Modern context

Although originally "Little Russia" (Rus' Minor) was merely a geographic, linguistic and ethnological term, it is now archaic and its usage in the modern context to refer to the country of Ukraine and the modern Ukrainian nation, its language, culture, etc., is considered an improper anachronism. Such usage is typically perceived as an imperial view that the Ukrainian territory and people ("Little Russians") belong to "one, indivisible Russia." Regardless of whether they are aware or not of its origin, today many Ukrainian nationalists consider the term to be disparaging, indicative of an "older brother" attitude, and of imperial Russian (and Soviet) suppression of the Ukrainian national idea. In particular, it has continued to be used in Russian national discourse, where modern Ukrainians is presented as a single people in united Russian nation. This added new hostility and disapproval of the term by some Ukrainians.

"Little Russianness"

Some Ukrainian authors define the "Little Russianness" (Template:Lang-uk) as a provincial complex they see in a part of the Ukrainian community due to its "lengthy existence within the Russian Empire" and describe it as an "indifferent, and sometimes a negative, stance towards the Ukrainian national-statehood traditions and aspirations, and often, the active support of the Russian culture and imperial policies". Mykhailo Drahomanov, who used the terms Little Russia and Little Russian in his historical works, applied the term Little Russianness to Russified Ukrainians, whose national character was formed under "alien pressure and influence", and who consequently adopted predominantly the "worse qualities of other nationalities and lost the better of their own". Ukrainian conservative ideologue and politician Vyacheslav Lypynsky defined the term as "the malaise of statelessness". The same inferiority complex was applied to the Ukrainians of Galicia with respect to Poland ("gente ruthenus, natione polonus"). Similar term Magyarony was applied to Magyarized Rusyns in Carpathian Ruthenia who advocated for the union of that region with Hungary.

Another criticized aspect labeled as "Little Russianness" is a stereotypical image of uneducated, rustic Ukrainians exhibiting little or no self-esteem. For example, a popular Ukrainian singer and performer Andriy Danylko in his stage personality of uncouth and Surzhyk-speaking Verka Serduchka was accused of perpetrating this demeaning image. Danylko himself usually laughs off such criticism of his work and many art critics point instead towards the fact that his success with the Ukrainian public is rooted in an unquestionable authenticity of Danylko's artistic image.

See also

Further reading

Notes

  1. http://www.torban.org/torban1.html
  2. http://www.torban.org/torban1.html
  3. Eternal Russia:Yeltsin, Gorbachev, and the Mirage of Democracy by Jonathan Steele, Harvard University Press, 1988, ISBN 978-0-674-26837-1 (page 216)
  4. Vasmer, Max (1986). Etymological dictionary of the Russian language. Moscow: Progress. p. 289. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  5. Some works of modern scholars that make such distinction are:
    Paul Robert Magocsi "The Roots of Ukrainian Nationalism: Galicia As Ukraine's Piedmont", University of Toronto Press (2002), ISBN 0-8020-4738-6
    Serhii Plokhy, "The Origins of the Slavic Nations: Premodern Identities in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus", Cambridge University Press (2006), ISBN 0-521-86403-8
  6. ^ Русина О. В. Україна під татарами і Литвою. — Київ: Видавничий дім «Альтернативи» (1998), ISBN 966-7217-56-6 — с. 274.
  7. Грушевський М.С. Історія України-Руси, том I, К. 1994, "Наукова думка", с. 1-2. ISBN 5-12-002468-8
  8. ^ Русина О. В. Україна під татарами і Литвою. — Київ: Видавничий дім «Альтернативи» (1998), ISBN 966-7217-56-6 — с. 276.
  9. «…Самой столицы Киева, також части сие Малые Руси нашия». "Воссоединение Украины с Россией. Документы и материалы в трех томах", т. III, изд-во АН СССР, М.-Л. 1953, № 147, LCCN 54-28024, с. 257.
  10. Яворницкий Д.И. История запорожских казаков. Т.2. К.: Наукова думка, 1990. 660 с. ISBN 5-12-001243-4 (v.1), ISBN 5-12-002052-6 (v.2), ISBN 5-12-001244-2 (set). Глава двадцать шестая
  11. "Листи Івана Сірка", изд. Института украинской археографии, К. 1995, с. 13 и 16.
  12. Русина О. В. Україна під татарами і Литвою. — Київ: Видавничий дім «Альтернативи», 1998. — с. 279.
  13. ^ In his private diary Taras Shevchenko wrote "Little Russia" or "Little Russian" 21 times, and "Ukraine" 3 times ("Ukrainian" - never) and ("Kozak" - 74). At the same time in his poetry he used only "Ukraine" (and "Ukrainian" - never). Roman Khrapachevsky, Rus`, Little Russia and Ukraine, «Вестник Юго-Западной Руси», № 1, 2006 г.
  14. Костомаров М. Две русские народности // Основа. — СПб., 1861. — Март.
  15. ^ Михаил Драгоманов, Малороссия в ее словесности, Вестник Европы. — 1870. — Июнь
  16. ^ Ukrainians in the Encyclopedia of Ukraine
  17. Analysis of the events of the Orange Revolution in Ukraine by Prof. Y. Petrovsky-Shtern Retrieved May 23, 2007
  18. Template:Ru icon Mikhail Smolin, "Преодоление «украинства» и общерусское единство" (Overcoming the "Ukrainianness" and the all-Russian unity), «Вестник Юго-Западной Руси», №1, 2006 г.
  19. ^ Ihor Pidkova (editor), Roman Shust (editor), "Dovidnyk z istorii Ukrainy", 3-Volumes, "Малоросійство" (t. 2), Kiev, 1993-1999, ISBN 5-7707-5190-8 (t. 1), ISBN 5-7707-8552-7 (t. 2), ISBN 966-504-237-8 (t. 3).
  20. Ihor Hyrych. "Den". Lypynsky on the imperative of political independence Retrieved May 23, 2007
  21. Template:Uk icon Serhiy Hrabovsky. "Telekritika". "Sour Milk of Andriy Danylko" Retrieved on May 23, 2007
  22. Template:Ru icon НРУ: Верка Сердючка - позор Полтавы, Korrespondent.net, 22 May 2007
  23. Template:Ru icon Алексей Радинский, Полюбить Сердючку, Korrespondent, 17 March 2007
Categories: