Misplaced Pages

Talk:Organ procurement: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:14, 18 July 2012 editBobby fletcher (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,468 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 19:18, 18 July 2012 edit undoBobby fletcher (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,468 edits Kilgour Matas ReportNext edit →
Line 30: Line 30:


::Please keep in mind that talk pages are for discussing the content of the articles; they are not platforms for the personal viewpoints of editors. Discussion about the reliability of the Kilgour/Matas source would be more appropriately placed on the relevant page, where such discussion relates to how the article may reflect the extant views about the sources reliability (i.e., again not for sharing personal viewpoints etc.). Thanks. ] (]) 18:38, 18 July 2012 (UTC) ::Please keep in mind that talk pages are for discussing the content of the articles; they are not platforms for the personal viewpoints of editors. Discussion about the reliability of the Kilgour/Matas source would be more appropriately placed on the relevant page, where such discussion relates to how the article may reflect the extant views about the sources reliability (i.e., again not for sharing personal viewpoints etc.). Thanks. ] (]) 18:38, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
::: Thank you Sound, I added the information because the Kilgour Matas report was mentioned in this article. I believe it is relevant since the original write up on the report is very matter-of-fact and entire one-side. There is a history of Falun Gong disciple pushing POV in wikis like this one. ] (]) 19:18, 18 July 2012 (UTC)


== Photo is dubious in nature == == Photo is dubious in nature ==

Revision as of 19:18, 18 July 2012

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Organ procurement article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL
WikiProject iconMedicine Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Organ harvesting / Organ theft

Shouldn't this article be merged with organ theft? /Slarre (talk) 13:55, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Israel

I have added the following paragraph. It is sourced. In December 2009, Israel admitted there had been organ harvesting of skin, corneas, heart valves and bones from dead bodies of Palestinians, Israeli soldiers and citizens and foreign workers, without permission from relatives, in the 1990s, but said that this practice no longer occurred. The revelation was a consequence of the Aftonbladet-Israel_controversy.http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/dec/21/israeli-pathologists-harvested-organshttp://aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article6323046.ab Aftonbladet: Israel tog organ – utan tillstånd]93.96.148.42 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:32, 16 February 2010 (UTC).

Kilgour Matas Report

Please note this report is a very questionable source, since it is pretty much entirely based on unreliable allegation made by members of the Falun Gong religious sect. All the parties supporting Kilgour Matas are Falun Gong outfits (Epoch Times, CIPFG, etc.):

1) US State Dept investigated this and found no evidence: http://www.america.gov/st/washfile-english/2006/April/20060416141157uhyggep0.5443231.html#ixzz20zxXq8mk

2) Well know China dissident Harry Wu voice disagreement and revealed the political nature of this allegation: http://www.facts.org.cn/Recommendations/200711/t68651.htm

3) Canadian journalist Glen McGregor Glen McGregor of Ottawa Citizen summarizing the dubious nature of the Falun Gong organ harvesting accusation: http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=8a3de338-e62d-4446-952a-7a6eedc772a7&p=1 http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/observer/story.html?id=2c15d2f0-f0ab-4da9-991a-23e4094de949&p=3

4) The Kilgour Matas report has since been declared exteremist writing by Russian courts: http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/12/24/extremist-writings-of-ex-canadian-mp-lawyer-banned-in-russia-because-of-criticisms-of-china/

Please consider these facts when editing the relevant passages, thanks. Bobby fletcher (talk) 18:09, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Please keep in mind that talk pages are for discussing the content of the articles; they are not platforms for the personal viewpoints of editors. Discussion about the reliability of the Kilgour/Matas source would be more appropriately placed on the relevant page, where such discussion relates to how the article may reflect the extant views about the sources reliability (i.e., again not for sharing personal viewpoints etc.). Thanks. TheSoundAndTheFury (talk) 18:38, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you Sound, I added the information because the Kilgour Matas report was mentioned in this article. I believe it is relevant since the original write up on the report is very matter-of-fact and entire one-side. There is a history of Falun Gong disciple pushing POV in wikis like this one. Bobby fletcher (talk) 19:18, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Photo is dubious in nature

the photo insert claims a fact that is not in evidence. The Falun Gong organ harvesting is an allegation not fact. At a minimum the description should including the word "alleged" or something like that. Bobby fletcher (talk) 19:14, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Categories: