Revision as of 03:38, 28 July 2012 edit72.175.57.8 (talk) →BLP criteria met?: subject is managing own page← Previous edit |
Revision as of 03:39, 28 July 2012 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,681 editsm Signing comment by 72.175.57.8 - "→BLP criteria met?: subject is managing own page"Next edit → |
Line 22: |
Line 22: |
|
WOW -- this is quite a detailed, extensive, and well-researched biography about a mouse researcher! How in the world does this fit into the criteria of BLP? I mean, we have a biography of graduate school studies and awarded fellowships, and even a link to his CV. Does anyone check the suitability of such biographies? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 02:28, 25 July 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
WOW -- this is quite a detailed, extensive, and well-researched biography about a mouse researcher! How in the world does this fit into the criteria of BLP? I mean, we have a biography of graduate school studies and awarded fellowships, and even a link to his CV. Does anyone check the suitability of such biographies? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 02:28, 25 July 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, never mind. Now I see what is going on. This entry was written by the subject himself using two pseudonyms, both of which were banned. The subject is now actively editing his own page under the name Guillaime2303, who also happens to be one of the 'top 300' contributors to Misplaced Pages, or so says his editor's page, where we can plainly see from the correspondence there that he falls into the broad category of people one would call 'Misplaced Pages bullies'. When others make changes to pages he's the first to revert edits, yet here he is massaging his own entry, which he himself wrote, and which has been nominated for deletion before. SHAM! |
|
Oh, never mind. Now I see what is going on. This entry was written by the subject himself using two pseudonyms, both of which were banned. The subject is now actively editing his own page under the name Guillaime2303, who also happens to be one of the 'top 300' contributors to Misplaced Pages, or so says his editor's page, where we can plainly see from the correspondence there that he falls into the broad category of people one would call 'Misplaced Pages bullies'. When others make changes to pages he's the first to revert edits, yet here he is massaging his own entry, which he himself wrote, and which has been nominated for deletion before. SHAM! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 03:38, 28 July 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
WOW -- this is quite a detailed, extensive, and well-researched biography about a mouse researcher! How in the world does this fit into the criteria of BLP? I mean, we have a biography of graduate school studies and awarded fellowships, and even a link to his CV. Does anyone check the suitability of such biographies? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.174.137.61 (talk) 02:28, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Oh, never mind. Now I see what is going on. This entry was written by the subject himself using two pseudonyms, both of which were banned. The subject is now actively editing his own page under the name Guillaime2303, who also happens to be one of the 'top 300' contributors to Misplaced Pages, or so says his editor's page, where we can plainly see from the correspondence there that he falls into the broad category of people one would call 'Misplaced Pages bullies'. When others make changes to pages he's the first to revert edits, yet here he is massaging his own entry, which he himself wrote, and which has been nominated for deletion before. SHAM! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.175.57.8 (talk) 03:38, 28 July 2012 (UTC)