User talk:HammerFilmFan: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 07:16, 24 July 2012 editHammerFilmFan (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users5,515 edits →Signing comments ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:33, 28 July 2012 edit undoViriditas (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers169,588 edits →Disruptive editing: new sectionNext edit →
Line 38:		Line 38:
	{{wb\|CMBJ\|quick FYI}}		{{wb\|CMBJ\|quick FYI}}
	{{wb\|CMBJ\|quick FYI}}		{{wb\|CMBJ\|quick FYI}}

			== Disruptive editing ==

			You recently placed at the top of the ] article while a POV dispute over the inclusion of gun control content is being ] and on on the ]. Per best practice, at 00:25, 28 July 2012, I gave notification and a rationale for adding the tag on the talk page. Your removal of this tag, in the middle of two separate discussion threads addressing this POV dispute, goes against best practices. As the tag on the article clearly states, "Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved." According to ], your edits are approaching the disruptive stage, so please consider this a warning to stop removing the tag until the POV dispute discussions have reached their end. ] (]) 11:33, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:33, 28 July 2012

Smetana

Hello, HammerFilmFan. You have new messages at Talk:Bedřich_Smetana#A_Question_for_Czech_nationals.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

http://freespirit1.wix.com/freespirit#!findus/c2414

Rantings at Tibet

Hello, HammerFilmFan. You have new messages at Talk:Tibet.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--HXL's Roundtable and Record 00:58, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Roman Libya

Hallo HammerFilmFan,

I answered on the Libya's discussion Page. Anyway, thanks a lot for detecting two errors of mine! Cheers, Alex2006 (talk) 14:03, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Susan Atkins photo

I do not believe that the picture on Susan Atkins page titled "mug shot of Atkins taken after her arrest" is a picture of Susan Atkins.I believe that the picture is of a person who portrayed Susan in issue 20 of Pop Smear magazine. The article recreated the killings in a photo journalist stle and participants were played by Maynard Keenan as Charles Manson as well as Dick Manitoba,Wayne Kramer,Arthur Kane,Texas Terri,Jeff Dahl. I notice that you had similar feelings about the pic. Can you help me with the next step please. Thanks Garwain — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garwain (talk • contribs) 18:43, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

http://freespirit1.wix.com/freespirit#!findus/c2414== MedCab ==

RfC on Red John issue

Hello, I have listed some comments on the case you have filed. You will find them on the case page. Let me know if I can be of any further assistance. Steven Zhang 21:25, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

http://www.inlandiapress.com/index.php/2011/05/20/did-patrick-jane-really-kill-red-john-in-season-finale/. Quote by creator of the show saying he is dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odoital25 (talk • contribs) 04:35, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

- and which we now know was either a lie, a mis-quote, or a misunderstanding - as Red John is "alive & well" in the show. HammerFilmFan (talk) 01:31, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

2012 Aurora shooting

Hey HammerFilmFan, I saw you undid my edit over on the 2012 Aurora shooting. I'm curious why you did. I added the reference and removed the {{citation needed}} template. Thanks. -- Luke (Talk) 17:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Hm, it appears we got into an edit conflict. I'm sorry about that. I re-added my ref. -- Luke (Talk) 17:37, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

New messages

Hello. You have a new message at CMBJ's talk page. Hello. You have a new message at CMBJ's talk page.

Disruptive editing

You recently removed a POV dispute tag placed at the top of the 2012 Aurora shooting article while a POV dispute over the inclusion of gun control content is being currently discussed on the talk page and on on the NPOV noticeboard. Per best practice, at 00:25, 28 July 2012, I gave notification and a rationale for adding the tag on the talk page. Your removal of this tag, in the middle of two separate discussion threads addressing this POV dispute, goes against best practices. As the tag on the article clearly states, "Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved." According to Misplaced Pages:NPOV dispute, your edits are approaching the disruptive stage, so please consider this a warning to stop removing the tag until the POV dispute discussions have reached their end. Viriditas (talk) 11:33, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:16, 24 July 2012 editHammerFilmFan (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users5,515 edits →Signing comments ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:33, 28 July 2012 edit undoViriditas (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers169,588 edits →Disruptive editing: new sectionNext edit →
Line 38:		Line 38:
	{{wb\|CMBJ\|quick FYI}}		{{wb\|CMBJ\|quick FYI}}
	{{wb\|CMBJ\|quick FYI}}		{{wb\|CMBJ\|quick FYI}}

			== Disruptive editing ==

			You recently placed at the top of the ] article while a POV dispute over the inclusion of gun control content is being ] and on on the ]. Per best practice, at 00:25, 28 July 2012, I gave notification and a rationale for adding the tag on the talk page. Your removal of this tag, in the middle of two separate discussion threads addressing this POV dispute, goes against best practices. As the tag on the article clearly states, "Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved." According to ], your edits are approaching the disruptive stage, so please consider this a warning to stop removing the tag until the POV dispute discussions have reached their end. ] (]) 11:33, 28 July 2012 (UTC)