Misplaced Pages

User talk:70.118.102.247: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:46, 30 July 2012 editMagog the Ogre (talk | contribs)Administrators100,751 edits Notice of sanctions: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 14:16, 30 July 2012 edit undo70.118.102.247 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:
] Thank you for ] to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, ], is on ]. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.<br><br>''The above is a ]. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you.''<!-- Template:uw-probation --> ''']''' (] • ]) <small>] (etc) template appreciated.</small> 18:04, 19 July 2012 (UTC) ] Thank you for ] to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, ], is on ]. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.<br><br>''The above is a ]. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you.''<!-- Template:uw-probation --> ''']''' (] • ]) <small>] (etc) template appreciated.</small> 18:04, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> --] (]) 07:15, 30 July 2012 (UTC)


<div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for your ] caused by ] and violation of the ]&#32;at ]. During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}} below this notice, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) (]) 13:42, 30 July 2012 (UTC)</div>{{z10}}<!-- Template:uw-3block --> <div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for your ] caused by ] and violation of the ]&#32;at ]. During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}} below this notice, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) (]) 13:42, 30 July 2012 (UTC)</div>{{z10}}<!-- Template:uw-3block -->

Revision as of 14:16, 30 July 2012

July 2012

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you continue with the behaviour on Battle of Šibenik (1991), you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you.

Please don't remove sourced content without listing a source to the contrary or actually disputing the listed source, particularly on such egregiously controversial issues. --Joy (talk) 08:19, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

I see there's a pattern of abusive behavior - you also wrote "Are you that butthurt" to another user in an edit summary. Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks. --Joy (talk) 08:21, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Kosovo War, is on article probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 18:04, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Yugoslav Wars. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:42, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Template:Z10

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of sanctions

Per WP:ARBMAC, I am hereby placing you on a one revert per article per week enforcement for the next 6 months for continued edit warring and WP:BATTLEGROUND behavior after being warned. If you violate that provision, you will be blocked. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:46, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

User talk:70.118.102.247: Difference between revisions Add topic