Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 23:28, 1 August 2012

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15

This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 6 sections are present.

TedderBot annotations

I remember inquiring a while back about whether or not the bot could leave the front or back of each line alone so that I could mark items as unrelated. I think another user was marking items checked as well. Just wondering if that was coming along or stalled. Thanks!--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 19:35, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Keeping this active. Yeah, I've made some progress towards enabling this, but it isn't ready. Remind me if you haven't heard back by October. tedder (talk) 02:48, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Comment to keep section from being archived: tedder (talk) 02:48, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Just a quick reminder. I haven't been adding the annotations to the NRHP list until this is added. There are a few on there that I would like to be able to tag, but I understand the complexity of it. Just checking! Keep up the good work!--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 18:32, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Tedderbot and Connecticut

Minor, but ironic. Connecticut Women's Hall of Fame, created on July 5 and which could not be more blatantly about Connecticut, never shows up on Tedderbot's runs under Connecticut. It has showed up elsewhere, the bot's run on Women's History and Good articles, for instance. I realize this is about the User:AlexNewArtBot/Connecticut that was written years ago. But isn't this the irony of ironies? Maile66 (talk) 11:41, 6 July 2012 (UTC).

Yeah, agree, that's too bad. tedder (talk) 16:17, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Cambro Manufacturing

Hi Tedder, I was working on improving new Cambro Manufacturing article that another editor had started, but it looks like you just deleted it. Is there any chance of you restoring it and giving me a chance to determine if it is notable and remove the copyrighted content? If I can't fix it in a few days, feel free to delete it then. Thanks, 72Dino (talk) 16:10, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Hey 72Dino. It was completely copyvio of this page. So there's little value in restoring it for the content. I'm not arguing notability or lack of- just saying there was no original content to build upon. tedder (talk) 16:13, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

OK. If I get some time in the future I'll look into creating the article myself so there won't be an issue with copyvio. 72Dino (talk) 16:16, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello - I worked on updated the copy for the Cambro Mfg page - can i repost for review? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fbazgan (talk • contribs) 21:59, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

I would suggest reading the process at Misplaced Pages:Articles for creation for creation and review. They have a great "incubator" for articles on borderline subjects, from new editors, etc. tedder (talk) 22:21, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

intervention

• context: Intelligent vehicle technologies

Please assist in supporting wp csd policy for deletion.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lperez2029 (talk • contribs) 02:37, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Please don't edit war from both a registered account and an IP. Also, you are claiming G7 of the CSD. You are failing in several criteria in a single sentence: "If requested in good faith and provided that the only substantial content to the page and to the associated talk page was added by its author." tedder (talk) 02:59, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

User:86.140.76.122

I noticed that you recently reverted User:86.140.76.122's edits to the Oregon article, and I wanted to let you know that this user has made similar edits to other U.S. state articles which have shown up on my WatchList including Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Pennsylvania. Any assistance you provide in reviewing the edits in question and possibly contacting the user would be most appreciated. --TommyBoy (talk) 21:37, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Done and done. Sigh. tedder (talk) 21:50, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Culver High

• context: User_talk:Joefaust#July_2012, edit, revert

Thanks, Tedder. I have zero interest in self-promoting at Culver High. A bunch of Culver High alumni were with me and wondered why "their" Olympian was not listed on the page; I was with some wiki editing experience; they wanted me to advance the page with "their" Olympian. So, would you please perhaps review the matter and perhaps improve the article with Culver High's Olympian, as you see fit. Joefaust (talk) 04:29, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Adding yourself with the link is self promotion enough, I'd think. Schools usually have an interesting idea about what "notable alumni" means to them, which differs from Misplaced Pages's policy. tedder (talk) 04:33, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Forget the link; that was for verification. A link to Rome 1960, the book, would do; the high school has many times over noted their Olympian. My personal online work is hard set simply to advance others. You might use: http://www.culverhighalumni.org/this-n-that.html Up to you. Joefaust (talk) 05:00, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

De-Rollback request

On my account User:TheGoofyGolfer.