Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Marquis de la Eirron: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:34, 6 August 2012 editOne Night In Hackney (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,879 edits →06 August 2012: +Cyprus← Previous edit Revision as of 20:34, 6 August 2012 edit undoOne Night In Hackney (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,879 editsm →06 August 2012: punctNext edit →
Line 19: Line 19:
:Just block per ] if it's easier, I don't mind. <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 15:49, 6 August 2012 (UTC) :Just block per ] if it's easier, I don't mind. <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 15:49, 6 August 2012 (UTC)


Checkuser can't confirm innocence, that's a long-established principle. As already shown in the archive he's got access to multiple ISPs including public computers (and even ], a negative checkuser just means he's using a different public computer probably. As noted above, but deliberately left out of his unblock request, there's also the same edits to ] which go way beyond adding an image - that edit alone is a ] in itself. <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 19:19, 6 August 2012 (UTC) Checkuser can't confirm innocence, that's a long-established principle. As already shown in the archive he's got access to multiple ISPs including public computers (and even ]), a negative checkuser just means he's using a different public computer probably. As noted above, but deliberately left out of his unblock request, there's also the same edits to ] which go way beyond adding an image - that edit alone is a ] in itself. <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 19:19, 6 August 2012 (UTC)


======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>======

Revision as of 20:34, 6 August 2012

Marquis de la Eirron

Marquis de la Eirron (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Marquis de la Eirron/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Marquis de la Eirron.

– An SPI clerk has endorsed a request for CheckUser. A checkuser will shortly review the case.

06 August 2012
Suspected sockpuppets


Repeating the same incorrect edit as one made by previous sock, plus this, this, this, and this (and more, just for the record) all happen to be adding images uploaded to Commons by a Marquis account there (named Slytherining Around32, same as a previous sock here). 2 lines of K303 10:21, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Just block per WP:DUCK if it's easier, I don't mind. 2 lines of K303 15:49, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Checkuser can't confirm innocence, that's a long-established principle. As already shown in the archive he's got access to multiple ISPs including public computers (and even IPs in completely different countries), a negative checkuser just means he's using a different public computer probably. As noted above, but deliberately left out of his unblock request, there's also the same edits to Ara Darzi, Baron Darzi of Denham which go way beyond adding an image - that edit alone is a WP:DUCK in itself. 2 lines of K303 19:19, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Re-opening case. Checkuser seems necessary now that I need to Tan (talk · contribs) blocked as a WP:DUCK has has requested it to confirm innocence. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:10, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Categories: