Revision as of 03:10, 11 August 2012 edit24.151.19.17 (talk) →Edit in Economic Predictions Section← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:12, 11 August 2012 edit undo24.151.19.17 (talk) →CriticismNext edit → | ||
Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
An anonymous editor has claimed that there is not enough criticism of Schiff in this article, and has therefore attempted to add more via weasel words and unsourced commentary. He has not (yet) discussed his proposed changes here. I invite him to add reliable sources to the "criticism" section I've created. As a broader point, however, he should be aware that Misplaced Pages BLP policy is to describe the views of the subject in detail and to allow him/her to respond to all notable critiques. This can result in the biography appearing to be overly supportive--but only if you do not fully understand Misplaced Pages rules. After all, the ] article isn't endorsing its subject, either.] (]) 19:57, 9 August 2012 (UTC) | An anonymous editor has claimed that there is not enough criticism of Schiff in this article, and has therefore attempted to add more via weasel words and unsourced commentary. He has not (yet) discussed his proposed changes here. I invite him to add reliable sources to the "criticism" section I've created. As a broader point, however, he should be aware that Misplaced Pages BLP policy is to describe the views of the subject in detail and to allow him/her to respond to all notable critiques. This can result in the biography appearing to be overly supportive--but only if you do not fully understand Misplaced Pages rules. After all, the ] article isn't endorsing its subject, either.] (]) 19:57, 9 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
TIMES: What is your relationship to Schiff? |
Revision as of 03:12, 11 August 2012
Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Peter Schiff article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Template:WikiProject Libertarianism Please add the quality rating to the{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. | Upload |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Peter Schiff. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Peter Schiff at the Reference desk. |
Archives | |||
Index
|
|||
This page has archives. Sections older than 45 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
Schiff is NOT Dr. Doom!
Dammit, he doesn't even have a Ph.D. How the hell can he be called Dr. Doom? That moniker belongs to either Nouriel Roubini or Marc Faber. To prove my point, Google "Dr. Doom" economics. I'm deleting that reference from the Wiki entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.9.187 (talk) 00:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- Calm down, get a drink of water, and don't get your panties in a bunch. :-) There is no copyright on the nickname, and it is simply a moniker. The two no-name guys you are talking about might have PhDs, but that doesn't matter in public perception. Dr. Evil didn't actually have a degree, neither did Dr. Strangelove or Dr. Octopus. But the nickname stuck anyway.--Screwball23 talk 19:43, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
- Just want to point out that Nouriel Roubini is better known and far more influential that than Peter Schiff, and that he is the economist usually credited with accurately foreseeing how the housing bubble and following recession would play out. LK (talk) 03:38, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not into economics like that, and I'm not a big fan of all these forecaster types anyway. I will end the discussion with the simple fact that there can be more than one Dr. Doom and in any case, whether you agree with me or not, the moniker does not literally mean the person has a PhD. In other words, if the guy is nicknamed "Dr. Doom", all that means is his nickname is "Dr. Doom", not that he's a doctor or PhD. Aside from a few frustrated geeks on wikipedia, there is no one who will argue that Schiff can't have the nickname because he does not have a PhD. --Screwball23 talk 06:44, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- Just want to point out that Nouriel Roubini is better known and far more influential that than Peter Schiff, and that he is the economist usually credited with accurately foreseeing how the housing bubble and following recession would play out. LK (talk) 03:38, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Regardless of any of this, all the article does is point out how he has been referred to by that moniker...and multiple citations are given to prove it. If this guy has a problem with Schiff being called that then he should take it up with the news media. Wikipedians didn't give Schiff that moniker, we just pointed out how he was called it. (And BTW...Henry Kaufman was called Dr. Doom before any of these guys.)
Also, Dr. Evil went to evil medical school when he was 18. He may very well have gotten his degree. Dr. Octopus certainly has a PhD...he was a well-respected nuclear physicist before he went crazy. --JohnDoe0007 (talk) 12:42, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Actually, it was Michael Hudson who laid out the best analysis of the coming crisis in his 2006 Harper's article: The new road to serfdom: An illustrated guide to the coming real estate collapse WjtWeston (talk) 03:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- ORLY? I'll take Ron Paul's prepared remarks at the House Financial Services Committee hearing on Sept 10, 2003. And Dr. Paul's statement isn't behind a paywall. Musicmax (talk) 16:54, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- : Good for Ron Paul. That means he's predicted 13 of the last 2 market crises. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.221.87.4 (talk) 23:48, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
False info
"Schiff admits his economic views are not mainstream, and like the Austrian School, he makes judgments without a strict adherence to economic statistics." Schiff thinks that macroeconmics is BS, but he often mentions P/E, and agrees that you can use statistics to analyze a particular company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.164.144.182 (talk) 15:56, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Not an Economist
Peter Schiff holds a bachelor's degree in Finance & Accounting from University of California Berkley.
Peter Schiff is a business person, stock broker, and television commentator-- this article refers to him as an Economist. This is a falsehood.
His "field" is securities trading, not financial economics. I am told he does not even use analytics in his business.
He uses pre-conceived slogans with economic lingo and acts like the dollar will implode and the US is going under, going so far as to about US manufacturing ability despite all available data, simply so he can sell more foreign securities and gold. It's a great propaganda game he has going on.
In short: Peter Schiff is a fraud, and so is this article — Preceding
unsigned comment added by 75.130.100.98 (talk) 04:32, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Edit in Economic Predictions Section
I edited out the phrase "a prediction that five years later has not proven correct" as this is an unsupported editor's opinion. That was my edit. It's not opinion at all. The dollar has not lost much of its value in 2007-2012. It just hasn't happened. The inflation rate 2007-2012 has been the lowest of any 5-year period in the past 2 decades. The reference "3" is only to Schiff's book, not to an authoritative source of the dollar's value five years after the book was written. In fact, a simple inflation calculator online will show the last five years the dollar has lost nearly 11 percent of its purchasing value! 184.7.109.84 (talk) 16:45, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
I also edited the following price by removing the very last unsupported (provably false) sentence.
- "On December 31, 2006 in a telecast debate on Fox News, Schiff forecast that "what's going to happen in 2007" is that "real estate prices are going to come crashing back down to Earth". This proved to be incorrect, as prices continued to rise throughout 2007."
In fact, every source I checked shows inflation adjusted real estate prices reversing their rise in mid 2006. It appears that Schiff was not so much making a prediction as stating what had already begun to happen. My sources:
- http://www.jparsons.net/housingbubble/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/United_States_housing_bubble#Causes
- http://www.globalpropertyguide.com/North-America/United-States/Price-History
184.7.109.84 (talk) 17:19, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- I agree, and can I add another source to yours? The US housing bubble peaked at the end of 2005:
- Reinhart, Carmen M.; Rogoff, Kenneth S. (2009). This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. p. 160 (see table 10.8). ISBN 978-0-691-14216-6.
- Skirtsy 22:07, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
There are many promoters of Schiff's persona as economic pundit and forecaster here. They have used the Wiki format to create seemingly objective endorsements of Schiff which can be used to enhance his business. Most of their source citations turn out to be Schiff PR or merely press or video reports of Schiff's unsubstantiated statements and opinions.
Criticism
An anonymous editor has claimed that there is not enough criticism of Schiff in this article, and has therefore attempted to add more via weasel words and unsourced commentary. He has not (yet) discussed his proposed changes here. I invite him to add reliable sources to the "criticism" section I've created. As a broader point, however, he should be aware that Misplaced Pages BLP policy is to describe the views of the subject in detail and to allow him/her to respond to all notable critiques. This can result in the biography appearing to be overly supportive--but only if you do not fully understand Misplaced Pages rules. After all, the Noam Chomsky article isn't endorsing its subject, either.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 19:57, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
TIMES: What is your relationship to Schiff?
- Cite error: The named reference
Kitco
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
- Biography articles of living people
- All unassessed articles
- Pages using WikiProject banner shell with duplicate banner templates
- C-Class U.S. Congress articles
- Low-importance U.S. Congress articles
- WikiProject U.S. Congress persons
- C-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Anti-war articles
- Low-importance Anti-war articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Skepticism articles
- Low-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- C-Class Alternative views articles
- Low-importance Alternative views articles
- WikiProject Alternative views articles
- C-Class Connecticut articles
- Low-importance Connecticut articles
- WikiProject Connecticut articles
- C-Class Internet culture articles
- Low-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- C-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- C-Class Economics articles
- Low-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- C-Class Finance & Investment articles
- Low-importance Finance & Investment articles
- WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
- Misplaced Pages requested images of business and economics people