Misplaced Pages

Talk:Patrick M. Byrne: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:02, 25 February 2006 editYamamoto Ichiro (talk | contribs)47,174 edits Article survived AfD← Previous edit Revision as of 14:18, 29 April 2006 edit undoLastexit (talk | contribs)154 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:

{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="text-align:center;" {| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="text-align:center;"
|- |-
Line 7: Line 6:


Removing details inserted by user concerning naked short-selling, which as stated were skewed entirely to the "anti-shorting" position. Interested users can go to the ] page, where a consensus article is being hammered out. I've also removed a paragraph of hagiography and unduly self-promotional and does not belong in a Misplaced Pages profile. --] 02:29, 24 February 2006 (UTC) Removing details inserted by user concerning naked short-selling, which as stated were skewed entirely to the "anti-shorting" position. Interested users can go to the ] page, where a consensus article is being hammered out. I've also removed a paragraph of hagiography and unduly self-promotional and does not belong in a Misplaced Pages profile. --] 02:29, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

I've added some details re recent controversies and widespread press coverage. --] 14:18, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:18, 29 April 2006

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 25 February 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

Removing details inserted by user concerning naked short-selling, which as stated were skewed entirely to the "anti-shorting" position. Interested users can go to the naked short selling page, where a consensus article is being hammered out. I've also removed a paragraph of hagiography and unduly self-promotional and does not belong in a Misplaced Pages profile. --Tomstoner 02:29, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

I've added some details re recent controversies and widespread press coverage. --Lastexit 14:18, 29 April 2006 (UTC)