Misplaced Pages

User talk:76.189.121.5: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:56, 16 August 2012 editAussieLegend (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers173,395 edits warning  Revision as of 16:57, 16 August 2012 edit undoAussieLegend (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers173,395 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Hotel Hell. (TW)Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
== Hotel Hell == == Hotel Hell ==
Your edits to the article have been opposed by two editors. Please do not continue to force them into the article, which is ]. As per ] you discuss the edits on the article's talk page if you really think your edits should be included, and while the matter is under discussion, the ] reigns. --] (]) 16:56, 16 August 2012 (UTC) Your edits to the article have been opposed by two editors. Please do not continue to force them into the article, which is ]. As per ] you discuss the edits on the article's talk page if you really think your edits should be included, and while the matter is under discussion, the ] reigns. --] (]) 16:56, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

== August 2012 ==
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 16:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
:''If this is a ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->

Revision as of 16:57, 16 August 2012

Hotel Hell

Your edits to the article have been opposed by two editors. Please do not continue to force them into the article, which is edit warring. As per WP:BRD you discuss the edits on the article's talk page if you really think your edits should be included, and while the matter is under discussion, the status quo reigns. --AussieLegend (talk) 16:56, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012

Your recent editing history at Hotel Hell shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. AussieLegend (talk) 16:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.